Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Survey of non-ALJ hearing programs in the federal government

Article Abstract:

The Administrative Conference began a survey in 1989 to determine agency use of non-administrative law judge (ALJ) hearing officers. Eighty-three hearing types were analyzed, accounting for a workload of approximately 343,200 cases. The five agencies comprising about 91% of the caseload were the Executive Office of Immigration Review of the Department of Justice, Health and Human Services, the Department of Veterans' Affairs, the Coast Guard, and the Department of Agriculture. The immigration cases accounted for 44% of the total. The subject areas were mainly enforcement matters and entitlements.

Author: Frye, John H., III
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Administrative Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0001-8368
Year: 1992

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Negotiating for knowledge: administrative responses to congressional demands for information

Article Abstract:

Congressional requests for administrative agency information could be handled in a less confrontational manner by negotiation. Instead of negotiations occurring ad hoc as they currently do, Congress and the executive branch could have a written agreement to structure negotiations regarding intrabranch sharing of sensitive information. Analyses of this issue tend to argue that Congress' right to information varies with executive and independent agencies, but recent Supreme Court holdings show that the division of agencies into these two categories has no basis in the Constitution.

Author: Shane, Peter M.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Administrative Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0001-8368
Year: 1992
Analysis, Separation of powers, Government information

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Project: the role of preemption in administrative law

Article Abstract:

Congress should give more deference to federal agencies to decide whether state and local laws unduly restrain interstate commerce or are otherwise preempted by federal powers. This would decrease litigation, allow agencies charged with enforcing federal laws on a given subject to fully perform the duties delegated to them, and inspire greater cooperation between the federal and state governments to achieve consistent, yet effective policies. The treatment of state pesticide, water and electric generation, hazardous waste, railroad and workplace safety laws are surveyed.

Author: Funk, Michael J., Sinozich, Paula A., Bose, Sanjoy K., Cummings, Joy I., Hallock, Elizabeth A., Hu, Kathryn R., Huber, Jeffrey A., Killien, Nancy L., Liaskos, Peter S., Lofgren, Mark L., Maxwell, John D., Rogers, Ann R., Wright, Jarrell D.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: Administrative Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0001-8368
Year: 1993
Interstate commerce, Exclusive and concurrent legislative powers, Preemption (Legislative power)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Powers and duties, Administrative agencies, Government agencies, Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The costs of regulating Microsoft. Changing the Federal Register to improve regulatory accountability. The cost of antiterrorist rhetoric
  • Abstracts: Audit strategies for defending against the accumulated earnings tax. Personal holding company tax grabs the unwary
  • Abstracts: Do parties to nuisance cases bargain after judgment? A glimpse inside the cathedral. Allocating the burden of proof in 60(b)(4) motions to vacate a default judgment for lack of jurisdiction
  • Abstracts: Public sector commissions and comaps: labor-management cooperation in state and local government. Union-management cooperation
  • Abstracts: Creating green markets. The annual report report card. A cloudy crystal ball for environmental progress
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.