Suspicion, or the new Prince
Article Abstract:
The grounds for believing that the US Supreme Court majority, in Bush v. Gore, acted out of a personal and ideological preference in awarding a victory in the 2000 presidential election to George W. Bush are examined.
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 2001
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
In defense of the Court's legitimacy
Article Abstract:
The author argues that the US Supreme Court's decision in Bush v. Gore was proper because it restored stability to the political system and ended a debate that the court feared was tearing the country apart.
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 2001
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Political judgments
Article Abstract:
The author argues that the US Supreme Court majority, in Bush v. Gore, showed evidence of a lack of judicial restraint and an unjustified intervention in the political process.
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 2001
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
- Abstracts: Diversification and other investment issues of charitable and other trusts. Unrelated business income and the charitable organization
- Abstracts: Still breathing. Protecting P.T.'s legacy
- Abstracts: Domestic violence. Divorce and distribution. Family law; a federal look at child support
- Abstracts: For this lawyer, the beat goes on. Amtrak's big tests ahead. NASCAR's complex world
- Abstracts: Forum selection; reviewing remands. Forum selection; federal venue rules. Removal traps