Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Taking text and structure seriously: reflections on free-form method in constitutional interpretation

Article Abstract:

The analysis of the treaty-making power by Bruce Ackerman and David Golove illustrates the problems with Ackerman's theory of higher lawmaking. Ackerman and Golove argue that development of the congressional-executive agreement has made the Constitution's Treaty Clause optional. However, their free-form approach to constitutional interpretation is flawed. A more rigorous analysis of the text and structure of the Constitution supports the exclusivity of the Treaty Clause. Considerations of efficacy, democracy or legitimacy adduced by Ackerman and Golove do not pertain to the issue of constitutionality.

Author: Tribe, Laurence
Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1995
Treaty-making power, Ackerman, Bruce

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


eroG .v hsuB and its disguises: freeing Bush v. Gore from its hall of mirrors

Article Abstract:

The author examines the resulting legal challenges from the disputed 2000 presidential election leading up to the Supreme Court's decision in Bush v. Gore, argues the court interrupted the constitutional process in its belief that it is the supreme interpreter of the Constitution, and proposes a reinvigoration of democracy through correcting the court's vision of the Constitution.

Author: Tribe, Laurence
Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 2001
Standards, Evaluation, Equality before the law, Equal protection, Due process of law, United States. Supreme Court, Election law, Political questions and judicial power

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Saenz san prophecy: does the privileges or immunities revival portend the future - or reveal the structure of the present?

Article Abstract:

The Supreme Court's revival of the 14th Amendment's privileges or immunity clause in Saenz v. Roe is discussed. Issues include the decision's failure to invoke the Equal Protection Clause, on which the Court relied in earlier state sovereignty cases, and the unlikelihood that Saenz marks a turning point in constitutional doctrine.

Author: Tribe, Laurence
Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1999
Cases, Federalism, State government, Sovereignty, Privileges and immunities

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Analysis, Interpretation and construction, Constitutional law, Constitutional interpretation
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Bankruptcy, high-tech and FAA Online. State BBSs, federal CDs. (bulletin boards and CDs for law professionals) (Internet
  • Abstracts: Proposed Roth IRA regulations issued in question and answer format
  • Abstracts: Finding the root causes; some see solutions to crime in 'nature vs. nurture' studies. Mandatories going, going ... gong; support for minimum drug sentences hits new low
  • Abstracts: The facts. Territorial sovereignty of islands and other maritime features - sovereignty of low tide elevations - presumptions with respect to sovereignty - critical date - treaty interpretation
  • Abstracts: The myth of self-managing teams: a reflection on the allocation of responsibilities between individuals, teams and the organization
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.