Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Taxpayer was entitled to rely on actuarial tables despite terminal illness

Article Abstract:

The IRS revised its requirements for formulating tax minimization options for the terminally ill in light of the tax annuity dispute in Estate of McLendon, but the agency did not wholly resolve the timing issue. The revised rule states the IRS will presume people are not terminally ill if survival from an illness or condition is better than 50% and will presume no terminal illness existed for people living at least eighteen months before dying from the illness or condition. The six month disparity between assumptions seems to encourage future challenges.

Author: Madden, Robert E., Hayes, Lisa H.R.
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Estate Planning
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0094-1794
Year: 1998
Taxation, Insurance, Terminally ill persons, Terminally ill, Statistics, Annuities

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Marital deduction disallowed due to condition subsequent

Article Abstract:

The 1996 Dowell case ruling illustrates how poor estate planning can lead to the disallowance of the marital deduction due to a condition subsequent. The decedent's insurance agency stock was to pass to a daughter, but the bequest failed because the heir failed to make specified payments to the decedent's spouse, whom the court determined to be the actual recipient of the stock. A disclaimer or other estate planning technique might have been a more appropriate arrangement, given the inability of the heir to make the payments required.

Author: Madden, Robert E., Hayes, Lisa H.R.
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Estate Planning
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0094-1794
Year: 1997
Estate Planning, Decedents

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Reformed trust didn't qualify for marital deduction

Article Abstract:

In Estate of Rapp the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a California probate court's estate reformation, fueling debate regarding federal courts encroaching on state probate courts' jurisdiction. Still, all parties agreed the state court should not have reformed the instrument. Without the federal court's rejection of the reformation, however, the estate would need to worry about conflicting state and federal tax treatments.

Author: Madden, Robert E., Hayes, Lisa H.R.
Publisher: Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Inc.
Publication Name: Estate Planning
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0094-1794
Year: 1998
Interpretation and construction, California, Probate law, Community property

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Analysis, Estate planning, Cases, Marital deduction
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Shopper's guide to remote access software. Shoppers guide to Personal Information Managers. Recover space without compression
  • Abstracts: Title III of the Helms-Burton Act is consistent with international law. Agora: the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (Libertad) Act
  • Abstracts: Metanoia and the rule of law in the single market. Reforming product liability. The ECJ: a court with a mission?
  • Abstracts: Lawyering beyond the year 2000: digit-sensitive issues aren't new. CBS veteran comes to AOL's rescue; starts new job under an avalanche of class actions; George Vandenburg III
  • Abstracts: Using a CRAT to pay for long-term care insurance. Pooled income funds: a good vehicle for smaller charitable gifts
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.