Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Testing the limits of judicial discretion in Chapter 11: the doctrine of necessity and third party releases

Article Abstract:

Judicial discretion to create equitable remedies such as the doctrine of necessity and third party releases is warranted under bankruptcy law, but such remedies should be limited to extraordinary situations and used in accordance with the underlying policies of bankruptcy reorganization. Bankruptcy courts exercising their broad equitable powers under section 105(a) of the Bankruptcy Code have used mootness doctrine and res judicata to overcome creditors' objections to such remedies. However, judicial discretion under Chapter 11 should be broad, but not unlimited.

Author: Han, Helen H.
Publisher: Oceana Publications, Inc.
Publication Name: Annual Survey of American Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0066-4413
Year: 1994
United States, Analysis, Remedies, Bankruptcy law, Judicial discretion, Equitable remedies

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Trading claims in Chapter 11 cases: legal issues confronting the postpetition investor

Article Abstract:

Claims against and interests in chapter 11 debtors have become increasingly popular as investments, and courts have recently begun to intervene to prevent perceived abuses. Bankruptcy Rule 3001(e) is the only legal provision governing trading in these claims and interests; an amendment is being considered by the Supreme Court. Courts have emphasized the need for adequate disclosure when investors solicit claims, but uniform guidelines have not been established.

Author: Charles, Scott K.
Publisher: Oceana Publications, Inc.
Publication Name: Annual Survey of American Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0066-4413
Year: 1992
Bankruptcy estates

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Commentary on Mr. Charles' paper: postpetition investor

Article Abstract:

The presentation by Scott K. Charles on investing in Chapter 11 claims and interests is the topic of comments and open discussion by participants in a bankruptcy law symposium held at New York University School of Law, Apr 12, 1991. Problems with claims trading, its influence on the bankruptcy process and the court intervention in the Allegheny case are among the topics discussed.

Publisher: Oceana Publications, Inc.
Publication Name: Annual Survey of American Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0066-4413
Year: 1992
Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Criticism and interpretation, Panel Discussion, Rosen, Leonard M., Trepper, Myron, Charles, Scott K.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Investments, Debtor and creditor
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Protecting thoughts and communications from invasive discovery: the attorney-client and work-product privileges
  • Abstracts: The Use of the Nonrecognition Provisions of Section 1031 in the Exchange of Partnership Interests: Recent Tax Court Cases
  • Abstracts: Standing to allege violations of the doctrine of specialty: an examination of the relationship between the individual and the sovereign
  • Abstracts: The arbitration of discrimination claims in employment cases
  • Abstracts: No hermits for the jury. Keeping sports fans off the jury helps players score in salary litigation; James W. Quinn
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.