Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The ABC's of EMG

Article Abstract:

Defense attorneys involved in personal injury litigation should familiarize themselves with the basics of electromyography (EMG) testing, which is a favorite tool of trial lawyers attempting to link a trauma to a symptomatic injury. Defense counsel should know that EMG results are less than conclusive if the tests have not been conducted consistently, beginning immediately after the injury. EMGs conducted more than 21 days after the injury provide no real proof of a link between the injury and any muscle or nerve damage, which could have been preexisting or caused by other factors.

Author: Williams, Thomas A., Poss, Charles W.
Publisher: Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel
Publication Name: Federation of Insurance & Corporate Counsel Quarterly
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0887-0942
Year: 1995
Methods, Testimony, Electromyography, Defense (Civil procedure)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The use of class actions in personal injury cases

Article Abstract:

The article discusses the use of class actions in personal injury cases in which the plaintiffs seek class certification, focussing on the effects of class certification on the case's dynamics and on the arguments to be expected in opposition to class certification.The 1990s rulings of the Supreme Court and courts of appeals offer good signs for defense lawyers opposing class certification, but the defense lawye must still be well prepared and offer good arguments against certification.

Author: Murray, James P.
Publisher: Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel
Publication Name: Federation of Insurance & Corporate Counsel Quarterly
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0887-0942
Year: 1999
United States, Usage, Class actions (Civil procedure), Class action lawsuits

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Ex parte contacts with plaintiffs' treating physicians

Article Abstract:

Defense counsel involved in medical malpractice suits should be careful when engaging in any ex parte contact with the physician named in the suit, as doing so could lead to sanctions. Though the ban on ex parte contact serves a real need, it often prevents counsel from doing their job. New, more detailed, guidelines on ex parte contact need to be established.

Author: Kopis, William F., Malkmus, Brian D.
Publisher: Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel
Publication Name: Federation of Insurance & Corporate Counsel Quarterly
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0887-0942
Year: 1995
Laws, regulations and rules, Medical personnel, Malpractice, Medical records, Access control, Medical malpractice, Ex parte procedure

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Personal injuries, states, United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The recline and fall of mechanical genus claim scope under "written description" in the sofa case. An (un)intended transitional provision in the GATT Act - 20 years from when?
  • Abstracts: Causation in fact in product liability failure to warn cases. The impact of the Cipollone case on federal preemption law
  • Abstracts: Sex discrimination. New regulations on equal treatment in pension schemes
  • Abstracts: The original understanding of the Takings Clause and the political process. The curious resurrection of custom: beach access and judicial takings
  • Abstracts: Extension of employment protection rights. Contractual rights. Draft agreement on part-time work
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.