Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The Patent and Trademark Office clashes with the Federal Circuit over means plus function

Article Abstract:

The Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) will not follow the Federal Circuit's guidelines for 'means plus function' analysis of patent applications. The court held the function to cover equivalents whereas the PTO prefers to hold to literal interpretations of means. The court guidelines come from In re Bond and the PTO holds that the court exceeded its authority. A uniform standard for 'means plus function' should be implemented to avoid future conflicts between the courts and the PTO.

Author: Silverberg, Sam
Publisher: Patent and Trademark Office Society
Publication Name: Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0882-9098
Year: 1992

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Advising clients in the wake of Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. David Geoffrey & Associates

Article Abstract:

The decision of Wilson Sporting Goods Co v. David Geoffrey and Associates has improved the interpretation of the equivalents doctrine. This decision holds that infringement of a dependent patent claim does not depend upon infringement of an independent patent claim. This interpretation is not new but rather uncovers a principle in use. Patent lawyers should keep this decision in mind to minimize damages or legal fees in willful infringement cases.

Author: Wille, David G.
Publisher: Patent and Trademark Office Society
Publication Name: Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0882-9098
Year: 1993

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Establishing infringement under the doctrine of equivalents after Malta

Article Abstract:

Federal Circuit Courts should provide more en banc decisions to clarify equivalents analysis for patent suits. It is difficult to establish patent infringement using the doctrine of equivalents, and the Federal Circuit has not applied consistent and clear standards. The recent decision of Malta v Schulmerich Carillons Inc did not help clarify the issues.

Author: Klein, Richard M.
Publisher: Patent and Trademark Office Society
Publication Name: Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0882-9098
Year: 1993

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Analysis, Interpretation and construction, Patent law, Equivalents doctrine (Patent law)
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Franchise commentary. Some remarks on the Federal Fair Franchise Practices Act. New Iowa franchise law: franchisors (and franchisees) beware
  • Abstracts: The new use of fair use: accessing copyrighted programs through reverse engineering. Novel DNA sequences and the utility requirement: the Human Genome Initiative
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.