Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The Securities and Exchange Commission's use of cease and desist authority: a preliminary appraisal

Article Abstract:

The SEC was granted a broad power to issue cease and desist orders by the Securities Enforcement Remedies and Penny Stock Reform Act of 1990. This authority allows the SEC to require an accounting, disgorgement and other remedies. The SEC has used this authority sparingly and in a manner similar to the civil injunctions it has used previously. The intent of Congress in creating this authority for the SEC was to grant a flexible mechanism to remedy securities fraud and other violations, which the SEC has yet to use effectively.

Author: Hansen, Steven W.
Publisher: West Group
Publication Name: Securities Regulation Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0097-9554
Year: 1993
Usage, Remedies, Powers and duties, Securities law, United States. Securities and Exchange Commission, Administrative remedies

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Shareholder proxy suits under federal securities laws should be viewed as direct actions

Article Abstract:

Currently, litigation by stockholders against corporations over proxy issues are derivative actions. The SEC would prefer that these be direct actions, which would exempt them from federal and state procedural rules and relieve the need for prelitigation demands. The issue is difficult because many activities performed by corporations and their boards can be viewed as having either direct or derivative causes for action.

Author: Quinn, Randall W.
Publisher: West Group
Publication Name: Securities Regulation Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0097-9554
Year: 1992
Stockholders' derivative actions, Shareholder lawsuits, Civil procedure

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Section 12(2) of the Securities Act of 1933: a remedy for fraudulent postdistribution trading?

Article Abstract:

Section 12(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 has been misinterpreted in recent case law as having no bearing on securities fraud in postdistribution trading, because the explicit word used is distribution. The Securities Exchange Act was supposed to be the agent of aftermarket fraud prevention. However, legislative intent clearly indicates that section 12(2) was meant to deter this crime.

Author: Maynard, Therese H.
Publisher: West Group
Publication Name: Securities Regulation Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0097-9554
Year: 1992
Securities fraud

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The rhetoric of results and the results of rhetoric: judicial writings. What's an opinion for?
  • Abstracts: The self-regulation of congressional ethics: substance and structure. Reforming congressional ethics procedures: lessons from the attorney disciplinary process
  • Abstracts: Subnational governance and the International Joint Commission: local management of United States and Canadian boundary waters. part 2
  • Abstracts: The electronic agency and the traditional paradigms of administrative law. Evidence before French administrative courts
  • Abstracts: Assessing arbitrator competence: a preliminary regional survey. A computer can facilitate an arbitrator's work
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.