Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The Supreme Court's ruling permitting same-sex harassment suits is one of several employment cases on this term's docket

Article Abstract:

The labor cases making up almost 20% of the US Supreme Court's 1997-98 docket could drastically change labor relations, and Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, the well-known case rulling that same-sex sexual harassment could violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, was just one. Others included Oubre v. Entergy Operations, Inc., ruling that an employee who had signed a no-suit waiver after accepting voluntary severance and receiving a severance payment, could still file suit. A number of other cases are covered.

Author: McKenna, Kathleen M., Weitzman, Allan H.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1998
United States. Supreme Court, 1998 AD

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


According to the Supreme Court, employers may not refuse to interview applicants solely for being paid union organizers

Article Abstract:

A recent Supreme Court ruling suggests non-union employers cannot casually decline to interview job applicants who are also union organizers. The Court decided in National Labor Relations Board v Town & Country Electric that the NLRA had correctly interpreted the meaning of 'employee' within the context of its purposes and authorizing legislation. It did not rule that Town & Country violated fair labor practice in refusing to interview union organizers, but it did extend to them anti-discrimination protections.

Author: McKenna, Kathleen M., Weitzman, Allan H.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
Membership, Employment interviewing, Labor unions

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The Supreme Court has held that a multiemployer group may impose contract terms unilaterally after a bargaining impasse

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court ruling in Brown v. Pro Football, Inc has stabilized the whole area of multiemployer bargaining, not just professional sports leagues by taking away the union's weapon of antitrust liability in bargainining over collective labor agreements. The court determined that a multiemployer group, in this instance the National Football League, was not subject to antitrust liability when imposing contract terms on a mandatory bargaining subject after a bargaining impasse.

Author: McKenna, Kathleen M., Weitzman, Allan H.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
Sports Teams and Clubs, Sports clubs, managers, & promoters, Professional Football, Laws, regulations and rules, Employers' associations, Collective labor agreements

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Labor law
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The Dutch Supreme Court reaffirms and clarifies 'de facto employer' under Article 15 of the OECD model. Tax jurisdiction in electronic commerce from the perspective of public international law- a paricular examination of income tax
  • Abstracts: The Supreme Court goes back to work. Stormy sessions: the court carries on through a blizzard and a budget freeze
  • Abstracts: Two agencies review forced arbitration: EEOC gets injunction against company that told workers: accept ADR or quit
  • Abstracts: High court spends snowy session hearing IP cases; a software dispute straddles line between compatibility and innovation. And should patent cases go to jury trials?
  • Abstracts: Are bulletin boards obsolete? 6 steps to a better Web page. State caselaw on the net: Locate hard-to-find primary research with this roadmap to state court sites
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.