Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The case for repeal of the Davis-Bacon Act

Article Abstract:

The Davis-Bacon Act should be repealed. Passed in 1931 in the Hoover era at a time when many contractors were quite successful with the strategy of using mainly unskilled black workers and local contractors who used highly skilled, better-paid union workers could not compete, the law's intent was to rectify such injustices. The law's racist beginnings were a basis for evolutionary discrimination, and there were many legislative attempts to repeal it. The political and financial power of the law's supporters explain the failed repeals.

Author: Kovach, Kenneth A., Eide, Laura Viehmyer
Publisher: Commerce Clearing House, Inc.
Publication Name: Labor Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0023-6586
Year: 1998
Construction industry, Laws, regulations and rules, Wage payment systems

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Collective bargaining in professional sports: baseball, football, basketball, and hockey

Article Abstract:

The main collective bargaining issues between sports club owners and players are the salary cap and player restraint systems, such as uniform player contracts, the draft, and trade and free agency programs. Courts only become involved to address antitrust issues after collective bargaining fails. The future of professional sports is likely to involve more labor conflicts. Players may unite across different sports because the bargaining issues remain the same, or a true free market may be adopted.

Author: Kovach, Kenneth A., Meserole, Margaret W.
Publisher: Commerce Clearing House, Inc.
Publication Name: Labor Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0023-6586
Year: 1997
Sports Teams and Clubs, Sports clubs, managers, & promoters, Professional Sports, Collective Bargaining, Analysis, Labor relations

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Correlates of employee satisfaction with pay and benefits: public/private and union/non-union comparisons

Article Abstract:

More than 900 public, private, union and non-union employees in various manufacturing jobs across the country were surveyed to determine their satisfaction with pay and benefits. Results showed satisfaction with pay to be higher in the private sector, where pay is higher. Benefits were better in the public than in the private sector and satisfaction with the benefits was also higher. Union employees had better pay and benefits but were less satisfied with them than non-union employees.

Author: Kovach, Kenneth A.
Publisher: Baywood Publishing Company, Inc.
Publication Name: Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0047-2301
Year: 1993
Manufacturing industry, Manufacturing industries, Surveys, Wages, Wages and salaries, Employee benefits, Job satisfaction

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The courts' assault on the Robinson-Patman Act. No team, no peace: franchise free agency in the National Football League
  • Abstracts: Mandatory arbitration of statutory issues under collective bargaining: Austin and its progeny. The enforceability of agreements to arbitrate employment disputes
  • Abstracts: The D.C. Circuit's use of the Chevron test: constructing a positive theory of judicial obedience and disobedience
  • Abstracts: Teacher bargaining in Minnesota: retrospect on the 1980s and prospects of fewer bargaining units. Collective bargaining and educational reform: establishing a labor-management partnership
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.