Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The commercial Constitution

Article Abstract:

Review of three 1994 US Supreme Court decisions invalidating state statutes for encumbering interstate commerce demonstrates that the Court's nondiscrimination analysis is not serving the rationales typically cited to justify Commerce Clause encroachment on state's rights. Economic efficiency, national unity and protection of out-of-state actors unrepresented in state government are the three dominant rationales. The Court's willingness to strike down all state regulation that appears to discriminate between in-state and out-of-state actors shows that the Court is committed to placing markets ahead of state's authority to regulate.

Author: Heinzerling, Lisa
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: Supreme Court Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0081-9557
Year: 1995
Interstate commerce

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The value of seeing things differently: Boerne v. Flores and Congressional enforcement of the Bill of Rights

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court's 1997 decision in Boerne v. Flores, which declared the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) unconstitutional, failed to recognize Fourteenth Amendment Congressional power to guarantee due process. The Court should have also recognized RFRA did not violate separation of powers, and did not allow Congress to intrude upon state sovereignty. RFRA allowed religious people to object to laws inhibiting religious practice.

Author: Cole, David
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: Supreme Court Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0081-9557
Year: 1997
Freedom of religion, Federalism, Due process of law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Traffic stops, minority motorists, and the future of the Fourth Amendment

Article Abstract:

Four US Supreme Court cases decided in 1996 and 1997 involving traffic stops by police demonstrate a troubling unanimity in Court opinion and insensitivity to practical experiences of minority drivers. The decisions favor interests of law enforcement over doctrinal legitimacy. The purported standard of "reasonableness in all circumstances" in fact rejects many circumstances that involve minorities.

Author: Slansky, David A.
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: Supreme Court Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0081-9557
Year: 1997
Searches and seizures, Race discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Interpretation and construction, Laws, regulations and rules, Constitutional law, Constitutional interpretation, Cases, Surveys, United States. Supreme Court
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Investor empowerment strategies in the Congressional reform of securities class actions. In-kind class action settlements
  • Abstracts: The implications of expanding international dispute settlement systems: the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea
  • Abstracts: Adoption and the Constitution: are adoptive parents really "strangers without rights"? A rape in cyberspace or how an evil clown, a Haitian trickster spirit, two wizards, and a cast of dozens turned a database into a society
  • Abstracts: Fairness opinion issues: anything but routine; even when investment bankers do not negotiate a deal, their fairness opinions may be vital
  • Abstracts: Inseverability clauses in statutes. The shrunken docket of the Rehnquist Court. Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.: an opinion that did not write
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.