Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The continued unsettled state of constructive trusts in bankruptcy: of Butner, federal interests and the need for uniformity

Article Abstract:

The legal interpretation of constructive trusts during bankruptcy proceedings has varied according to court of law. The US Courts of Appeals in the Third, Sixth, Eighth, and Ninth Circuits have developed three approaches to the issue with case-by-case variations. Conflicts arise from the imperative to provide justice to all creditors and to treat bankruptcy as a procedural matter. The US Supreme Court's 1979 decision in Butner v. United States ruled states should determine property law unless federal authority had an overriding interest. Arguments have been made on all sides of the guidelines. Congressional legislation should clarify the inconsistencies.

Author: Keach, Robert J.
Publisher: Commercial Law League of America
Publication Name: Commercial Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-3055
Year: 1998
States, Bankruptcy Law, Other Justice, Public Order, and Safety Activities, Constructive trusts

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Bankruptcy abandonment power and environmental liability

Article Abstract:

The author discusses the US Supreme Court's decision in Midlantic National Bank v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Bankruptcy Code of 1978 section 554 in regards to the abandonment of environmentally contaminated property during bankruptcy.

Author: Bolea, Brent
Publisher: Commercial Law League of America
Publication Name: Commercial Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-3055
Year: 2001
Toxic torts, Abandonment of property, Abandonment (Law), Brownfields

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


How explicit do you need to be? an analysis of the rule of explicitness after Southeast Banking

Article Abstract:

The author discusses the origins and current state of bankruptcy law's Rule of Explicitness on the drafting and enforcement of subordination agreements, and the effect of the Rule on existing and future contracts.

Author: Van Meter, Heather J.
Publisher: Commercial Law League of America
Publication Name: Commercial Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-3055
Year: 2000
Contracts, Subordinated debentures

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Interpretation and construction, Laws, regulations and rules, Bankruptcy law
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The role of industrial relations in achieving social equity: a comparison of labor laws in Australia and the United States
  • Abstracts: The conception that the corporation is a nexus of contracts, and the dual nature of the firm. Measuring the domain of mediating hierarchy: how contestable are U.S. public corprations?
  • Abstracts: States may not claim immunity in patent cases; a New Jersey federal court rules that states can be held liable for patent infringement
  • Abstracts: Text and context: discerning the basis for debtor's attorneys' fees under Chapter 7 and 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
  • Abstracts: An analysis of the Supreme Court's resolution of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act citizen suit debate
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.