The courts and private ADR: partners in serving justice

Article Abstract:

The courts and the private alternative dispute resolution (ADR) system are independent systems of justice in some ways but interdependent in others. The two systems are independent because they use different techniques to resolve disputes. The systems are interdependent because the courts need ADR in order to decrease caseload, and ADR needs the courts to insure the integrity of the ADR system. ADR is a natural outcome of a continually evolving justice system.

Analysis, Prevention, Justice, Administration of, Administration of justice, Court congestion and delay, Court delay

---

ADR in technology disputes

Article Abstract:

Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is appropriate for the technology industry. Technology professionals value confidentiality and speed, and ADR offers both. Technology can be difficult to understand, and ADR neutrals can be experts in the field. ADR is open to the creativity that works well with innovative technological professionals.

High technology industry, Negotiation, mediation and arbitration

---

Similar abstracts:

• Abstracts: Recalling the papers and the papers. CFTC shouldn't license the press
• Abstracts: The role of the corporate attorney within the takeover context: loyalties to whom? SEC enforcement actions against securities lawyers: new remedies vs. old policies
• Abstracts: ADR: the Siemens experience. Integrating ADR: a matter of legal practice
• Abstracts: The evolution of contractually mandated arbitration. Intellectual property: arbitrating disputes in the United States
• Abstracts: Mediating employment disputes under the Disabilities Act. Mediating disputes between banks and small businesses

This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.