Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The due process roots of criminal collateral estoppel

Article Abstract:

The Due Process Clause should be considered as a basis for increasing criminal collateral estoppel protections for criminal defendants charged successively with allegations that have substantial overlapping evidence. The Double Jeopardy Clause was found to encompass common law collateral estoppel protections by the Supreme Court in Ashe v. Swenson, but the Court should have considered due process as an additional source. Increased attention to criminal collateral estoppel's due process component is needed to ensure that prosecutors cannot use criminal trials as practice runs.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1996
Due process of law, Double jeopardy, Evidence, Criminal, Criminal evidence, Res judicata, states

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Exposing the extortion gap: an economic analysis of the rules of collateral estoppel

Article Abstract:

Economic analysis of three regimes of collateral estoppel or issue preclusion demonstrates that the current asymmetrical rules are less desirable than either complete mutuality or complete preclusion. Under the current system, issues decided adversely against a party may be precluded from litigation by other parties, but issues decided favorably are not precluded. Contrary to popular belief, this system favors earlier plaintiffs over later ones. A system of complete mutuality creates equal incentives for litigation, whereas complete preclusion is most cost-effective.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1992
Economic aspects, Estoppel

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Estopping the madness at the PTO: improveing patnet administration through prosecution history estoppel

Article Abstract:

The US?Patent and Trademark Office should ensure that patents with a high potential social cost be subjected to greater scrutiny during the patent process.? Prosecution history estoppel can help the PTO determine which patents are likely to carry a high cost.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 2003
Legal issues & crime, Government regulation (cont), Government regulation, Management dynamics, Legal/Government Regulation, Practice, United States. Patent and Trademark Office, Equivalents doctrine (Patent law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The price of doing business: environmental criminal fines and the administrative expense solution. The administrative relationship between the district and bankruptcy courts
  • Abstracts: The strike force was with him; Memphis professor says defense lawyer group saved him from criminal charges in King assassination probe, but prosecutors are scoffing
  • Abstracts: Current issues in prepackaged Chapter 11 plans of reorganization and using the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act for instant reorganizations
  • Abstracts: Scenic landscape protection under the police power. Easing the credit crunch: a "functional" approach to lender control liability under CERCLA
  • Abstracts: Professionalism and money. Service to clients comes first; lawyers need to make the right ethical choices to produce the best results
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.