Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The environmental sentencing guidelines for business organizations: are there murky waters in their future?

Article Abstract:

The Advisory Work Group (AWG) proposals for environmental sentencing guidelines for organizations represent a substantial departure from the procedure established in previous organizational sentencing guidelines. The main differences include method of calculating fines, credit for compliance programs, the 'collar' provision for mitigating circumstances, and the 'count stacking' provision for multiple violations. The AWG draft guidelines were not adopted by the Sentencing Commission, but may influence future proposals. A dissent was also issued by two members of the AWG.

Author: Fiorelli, Paul E., Rooney, Cynthia J.
Publisher: Boston College Law School
Publication Name: Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0190-7034
Year: 1995
Standards, Sentences (Criminal procedure), Criminal liability of juristic persons, Juristic persons criminal liability

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Should environmental monetary sanctions be tax deductible?

Article Abstract:

Allowing monetary sanctions for certain violations of environmental law to be tax-deductible could be sound from an environmental policy perspective. Although the tax and environmental laws are complex with regard to sanctions, judges and attorneys may have some latitude in structuring environmental sentences and settlements so that at least some of the money would go to provide restitution to victims and remediation of the environment.

Author: Smith, John C.
Publisher: Boston College Law School
Publication Name: Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0190-7034
Year: 1999
Planning, Taxation, Tax deductions, Sanctions (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


NRD trustees: to what extend are they truly trustees?

Article Abstract:

An argument that courts should hold executive branch natural resources damages trustees to an enforceable fiduciary duty rather than just granting them traditional agency deference is given.

Author: Rowley, Laura
Publisher: Boston College Law School
Publication Name: Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0190-7034
Year: 2001
Environmental aspects, Fiduciary duties

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Remedies, Offenses against the environment, Environmental crimes
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The environmental legacy of Saddam Husayn: the archaeology of totalitarianism in modern Iraq. Political corruption in Russia and the Soviet legacy
  • Abstracts: Missing time-series data and the impact of sentencing guidelines in Minnesota: can the debate be adjudicated? Challenges for multilevel models of school disorder: response to Hoffmann and Johnson
  • Abstracts: The prudent operator standard: applications beyond the oil and gas lease. The mutual benefit implied covenant for oil and gas royalty owners
  • Abstracts: Parent-subsidiary communications and the attorney-client privilege. Antitrust divestiture in network industries
  • Abstracts: Wanted: a theoretical construct for mediation practice. Bridging cultural gaps in mediation. A theory of mediation
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.