Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The four doctrines of self-executing treaties

Article Abstract:

US courts have conflated the four separate doctrines of self-executing treaties, failing to recognize the distinct types of reasons causing treaties to be judicially unenforceable. These could be called the intent-based, justiciability, constitutionality, and private right of action doctrines. Courts should look beyond non-self-executing and self-executing terminology, instead ruling on the specific reasons for claiming particular treaties as judicially unenforceable. Despite the Supremacy Clause's general recognition of all treaties, these four doctrines are reasons for courts to rule that legislative action is needed to authorize enforcement of a treaty.

Author: Vazquez, Carlos Manuel
Publisher: American Society of International Law
Publication Name: American Journal of International Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0002-9300
Year: 1995
international

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Breard and the federal power to require compliance with ICJ orders of provisional measures

Article Abstract:

The Clinton Administration failed to execute its duties under the US Constitution when it refused to order the governor of Virginia to stay the execution of Paraguayan Angel Francisco Breard, who had been convicted of homicide. US Constitution, article 2, section 3 confers upon the President the power and duty to execute federal law, including treaties to which states are subject. The International Court of Justice had ordered the US, under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, to stay the execution.

Author: Vazquez, Carlos Manuel
Publisher: American Society of International Law
Publication Name: American Journal of International Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0002-9300
Year: 1998
Laws, regulations and rules, Executive power

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Breard and treaty-based rights under the consular convention

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court failed to address the rights of consular officers and foreign states that a convicted Paraguayan murderer exhausted during the state trial phase his rights under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations in its decision of Breard v. Greene. The Convention stipulates that an arrested foreigner should be immediately notified of his right to contact consular officials. Breard was not notified of his right, and was sentenced to death during the state trial.

Author: Paust, Jordan J.
Publisher: American Society of International Law
Publication Name: American Journal of International Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0002-9300
Year: 1998

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Interpretation and construction, Treaties, Conflict of laws, Jurisdiction
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Ten tips for selecting a litigation support vendor. Client/server scheduling solution. Simplified database creation
  • Abstracts: Federal practice; complex litigation. Complex litigation; the art of interviewing
  • Abstracts: The effects of individual difference factors on the acceptability of ethical and unethical workplace behaviors
  • Abstracts: The effects of cultural dimensions on ethical decision making in marketing: an exploratory study. An ethical and legal synthesis of dumping: growing concerns in international marketing
  • Abstracts: High tech, low privacy. Hard to swallow; while federal law shut the door on regulation of dietary supplements, marketing hype may be leading the popular aids up courthouse steps
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.