Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The idea of a useable past

Article Abstract:

The constitutional legal scholar approaches history in a different manner than the historian, but the fact that legal scholars may focus on useable history does not imply that they are merely advocates with a specific agenda sorting through history in search of ways to justify their positions. It is true that some constitutional theorists do take liberties and use generalizations about the constitutional period to assert the Framers' support on specific, contemporary issues. Legal scholars should use history properly, but their explorations need not mirror those of historians.

Author: Sunstein, Cass R.
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1995
Interpretation and construction, Criticism and interpretation, Constitutional interpretation, Constitutional history, Flaherty, Martin S.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Neutrality in constitutional law (with special reference to pornography, abortion, and surrogacy)

Article Abstract:

The principle of neutrality or impartiality in constitutional law often takes existing practices as a baseline, ignoring the history of the practices in question and the way they have already been constituted by legal rules. In debates on pornography, abortion and surrogacy, the neutrality principle tends to favor existing sexual and reproductive practices which discriminate against women. Once existing practices are questioned, arguments based on equal protection become more plausible.

Author: Sunstein, Cass R.
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1992
Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Pornography, Sex discrimination, Abortion, Fairness, Surrogate motherhood

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Social norms and social roles

Article Abstract:

Law can operate effectively as a collective action mechanism to change social norms and roles that are unproductive or weakly supported by society. Social norms and practices often confound economic assumptions of rational behavior and undermine the value of analysis based on personal preferences. The role of the law can and should be more active than to simply defend individual rights to these preferences. The law can alter norms that cause harm or result in a loss of autonomy.

Author: Sunstein, Cass R.
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1996
Social norms, Rational expectations (Economics), Sociological jurisprudence

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Analysis, Constitutional law, Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Enforceability of rule 26(c) confidentiality orders and agreements. Documentation retention in the electronic age
  • Abstracts: Opium problems: estimation of illegal crops and diversion of legal crops. Money laundering in the South: the modernity of tradition
  • Abstracts: Has the evolution of the poison pill come to an end? Revlon and deal-protection devices. A fresh look at deal protection devices: out from the shadow of the omnipresent specter
  • Abstracts: How to use the Internet for estate planning and tax research. Post-mortem strategies extend planning prospects
  • Abstracts: Women take the bar group helm; gains continue at state and local levels. State bars try reform on election
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.