Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The intersection of CERCLA and RCRA: what companies should know

Article Abstract:

CERCLA and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) are powerful and complex statutes often open to diverse interpretations by the EPA, and any company dealing in products with a potential for environmental damage should be well informed of their details. RCRA is intended to govern the handling of environmentally hazardous materials from generation to disposal, but it does not specifically address cases of improper past disposal and cleanup, and this is what CERCLA handles. CERCLA's provision for punitive damages has no exact parallel in RCRA, but civil and criminal penalties provide similar incentives.

Author: Oliver, Roseann
Publisher: Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel
Publication Name: Federation of Insurance & Corporate Counsel Quarterly
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0887-0942
Year: 1992

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Regulation of multiple employer welfare arrangements: the dilemma of dual federal/state regulation

Article Abstract:

The legal status of multiple employer welfare arrangements (MEWA) is unclear in many states, due to conflicts between state insurance laws and federal employee benefits laws. Most states treat MEWAs involved in insurance and workers' comp as illegal, due the insurance-like activity undertaken by administrators who are not licensed by the state to work in the insurance industry. States should stop making such claims until they develop a predictable and clear scheme for MEWA regulation.

Author: Borrelli, Cynthia J., Jones, Richard V., McHugh, Charlene C.
Publisher: Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel
Publication Name: Federation of Insurance & Corporate Counsel Quarterly
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0887-0942
Year: 1995
United States, Health insurance, Employee benefits, Workers' compensation, states

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Environmental liability and its insurance in Germany

Article Abstract:

The German insurance industry's HUK Model for coverage of environmental impairment liability is inadequate. The Model was developed in response to the 1990 Environmental Liability Act which could be used to charge a polluter up to DM 320 million for property or bodily damage. The Model does not adequately address the prior existence of pollution, and its relevance to former East German polluters is questionable.

Author: Hoffman, William C.
Publisher: Federation of Defense and Corporate Counsel
Publication Name: Federation of Insurance & Corporate Counsel Quarterly
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0887-0942
Year: 1993
Liability for environmental damages, Pollution liability insurance

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Analysis, Interpretation and construction, Conflict of laws, Environmental law, Laws, regulations and rules
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: International integration and democracy: no love at first sight. Courts and democracy in postconflict transitions: a social scientist's perspective on the African case
  • Abstracts: The fifty-first session of the UN Commission on Human Rights. The 2000 judicial activity of the International Court of Justice
  • Abstracts: Fawell introduces legislation to overhaul ERISA. Health care reform may soon pass. Administration sends two health care reform proposals to Congress
  • Abstracts: Securities lending transactions can have uncertain tax results
  • Abstracts: The employment regulation of Americans abroad and in foreign owned businesses in the U.S
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.