Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The judiciary needs judicious growth

Article Abstract:

Federal court congestion has spurred recognition of the need for an increase in federal judgeships. Federal district judges are trial judges who work alone, so increasing their number would probably not affect the court's work flow adversely. Circuit judges interact directly, however, so collegiality is all-important. Since circuit court and judges need time to get used to each other, it would be unwise to increase the judges' number by more than 15 to 20% every three years. The courts rather than Congress should develop the principles according to which they wish to expand.

Author: Sloviter, Dolores K.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1993

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


More judges, less justice; the case against expansion of the federal judiciary

Article Abstract:

Stephen Reinhardt's suggestion that the number of federal circuit court judges be doubled is ill-advised. Indeed, most circuits have too many judges rather than too few. The productivity of individual judges decreases as court size increases because more of their time must be spent monitoring their colleagues' opinions. The disadvantages of adding new judges should not be forgotten. They diminish court efficiency and undermine collegiality. Larger appellate courts also affect the law's clarity and stability adversely, making for new incentives to litigate.

Author: Tjoflat, Gerald Bard
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1993
Evaluation, Court congestion and delay, Court delay

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


So you want to become a federal judge by 35? Follow these instructions and, who knows, maybe they'll work for you too

Article Abstract:

Lawyers interested in becoming federal judges should get into politics. Judicial selection is a partisan political process, even though judging is not. Political activities should include getting to know the senator from your state, making friends in both political parties and if possible becoming employed in Washington. Lawyers should come close to the line between being persistent and being a bother, but be careful not to cross that line.

Author: Kozinski, Alex
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1996
United States, Employment

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Officials and employees, Supply and demand, Judges, Federal courts
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: While the property reform legislation is stalled in Congress, state as well as federal judges are deciding when wetland regulation is tantamount to a taking
  • Abstracts: The Cambodia settlement agreements. Drawing a better line: uti possidetis and the borders of new states. The protection of human rights through the Dayton/Paris Peace Agreement on Bosnia
  • Abstracts: Reforming the Immigrant Investor Program of the Immigration Act of 1990. China's equity joint venture law: a standing invitation to the West for foreign investment?
  • Abstracts: Japan's patent system: an analysis of patent protection under Japan's first-to-file system. Animal variety protection: a proposal for a US model law
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.