Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The jurisprudence of legitimacy: applying the Constitution to U.S. territories

Article Abstract:

The DC and Ninth Circuit courts disagree over the territorial force of constitutional provisions. The Ninth Circuit, in cases involving the Northern Mariana Islands, stresses the people's consent to US American government. The DC Circuit, in cases involving American Samoa, stresses the constitutional limits of US control because the people have no acknowledged rights of self-government. In each case the interpretation maximizes the legitimacy of US rule according to local circumstances. Therefore, the differences should not be resolved, but perhaps made more explicit.

Author: Katz, Robert A.
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1992
Cases, Constitutional law, Jurisdiction, Territorial, Territorial jurisdiction

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Dangerous places: the right to self-defense in prison and prison conditions jurisprudence

Article Abstract:

The US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit failed to acknowledge the due process and civil rights that should be afforded prisoners in finding in Rowe v. Debruyn that prisoners in the Indiana prison system have no right to self-defense. The right to self-defense is fundamental to criminal law. When the state fails to adequately protect prisoners from violence, due process dictates that the prisoners should be able to protect themselves. The courts should take some responsibility for prison conditions and allow prisoners to plead self-defense when appropriate.

Author: Kaye, Anders
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1996
Safety and security measures, Prisoners, Prison violence, states

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Self-defense and subjectivity

Article Abstract:

The defense of self-defense in a criminal case requires an "imminent" threat to life. Some believe this to be a strict objective standard while others argue for a more subjective interpretation. The author argues that this debate is fruitless. It must take into account what criminal law means to society and social relations.

Author: Nourse, Victoria F.
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 2001
United States, Analysis, Defense (Criminal procedure), Feminist jurisprudence, Battered woman syndrome (Law), Battered person syndrome

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Self-defense (Law), Self defense (Law)
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The last word debate: how social and political forces shape constitutional values. At the halfway point: light docket makes it hard to read trends in Supreme Court decisions
  • Abstracts: Militias misinterpret Constitution. Militia claims baseless. Well-regulated militia: who calls the shots?
  • Abstracts: The role of cost-effectiveness analysis in assessing HIV-prevention interventions. Building community and culture are essential to successful HIV prevention for gay and bisexual men
  • Abstracts: Adoption and the Constitution: are adoptive parents really "strangers without rights"? A rape in cyberspace or how an evil clown, a Haitian trickster spirit, two wizards, and a cast of dozens turned a database into a society
  • Abstracts: Imputed benefit accrual service. Required beginning date for qualified plan distributions. Final separate lines of business regulations
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.