Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The knock and announce rule: a new approach to the destruction-of-evidence exception

Article Abstract:

The destruction-of-evidence exception to the 'knock and announce' rule under the Fourth Amendment should be applied under a 'reasonable alternatives' approach. Many courts allow a blanket exception for any case involving drugs, an approach which tends to overwhelm the rule. Other courts apply a 'particularity approach' requiring probable cause, but this approach tends to lessen the effectiveness of law enforcement. The proposed 'reasonable alternatives' approach would include a good faith requirement and would encourage use of alternatives such as entry by ruse rather than by force.

Author: Garcia, Charles Patrick
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1993
Narcotics, Control of, Narcotics control, Searches and seizures, Evidence, Criminal, Criminal evidence

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Solving the problem of gender and racial bias in administrative adjudication

Article Abstract:

The hybrid status of administrative law judges (ALJs), as both independent judges and administrative agency officials, has complicated the development of law covering bias in administrative hearings. Procedures for addressing gender, race and ethnic group bias could be developed without violating the independence of ALJs. Mechanisms should be established for raising and resolving bias complaints that include involving the special counsel for an agency, developing a record and using a committee composed of other ALJs.

Author: Golin, Elaine
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 1995
Analysis, Discrimination in justice administration, Justice discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Alaska Hunters and the D.C. Circuit: a defense of flexible interpretive rulmaking

Article Abstract:

The author examines US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia cases regarding the Administrative Procedure Act and the mandated notice procedure when agencies change the interpretation of their own rules. He concludes the court has failed to address the correct problems with administrative interpretation.

Author: Connolly, Jon
Publisher: Columbia Law Review
Publication Name: Columbia Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0010-1958
Year: 2001
United States, Interpretation and construction, Administrative law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Notice (Law), United States, Administrative procedure
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Dispute resolution and avoidance techniques in the construction industry. Construction dispute prevention comes of age
  • Abstracts: The international suture: a comparative approach to patenting methods of medical treatment. "The same effect" United States provisional patent applications and Paris Convention priority rights
  • Abstracts: The American franchise lawyers' nightmare. New directions in Canadian franchise legislation
  • Abstracts: The cross-border insolvency paradigm: a defense of the modified universal approach considering the Japanese experience
  • Abstracts: Progress and challenges of privatization: the Croatian experience. The Republic of Ireland's economic boom: Can the Emerald Isle sustain its exponential growth?
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.