Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The new value exception: a plea for modification or elimination

Article Abstract:

The absolute priority rule was codified by Congress in the 1978 Bankruptcy Code without including the new value exception which allowed junior creditors to retain an interest in the bankrupt entity if they added to its value. The absence of the new value exception in the Code increase concerns about its validity while continued confusion about its requirements limit its usefulness. Therefore, another reorganization assistance method is advisable that both Congress and the courts accept, such as giving junior creditors the value of new contributions as interest in the entity.

Author: Craig, Michelle
Publisher: Emory Baptist Church
Publication Name: Bankruptcy Developments Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0890-7862
Year: 1995

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Show me the money: the debate over creditors' postpetition attorneys' fees

Article Abstract:

Creditors' right to collect attorneys fees during proceedings to recover unsecured claims should be allowed under a correct reading of Bankruptcy Code section 506(b), but courts have offered conflicting views. The US 2d Circuit Court of Appeals decision in United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc. v. Equitable Life Assurance Society supports the collection of fees. This view should prevail over the US Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas decision in Sakowitz, Inc. v. Chase Bank International.

Author: Geoffroy, Ray
Publisher: Emory Baptist Church
Publication Name: Bankruptcy Developments Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0890-7862
Year: 1998
Attorneys, Lawyers' fees

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The economic case for judicial deference to break-up fee agreements in bankruptcy

Article Abstract:

An economic analysis of break-up fee agreements suggests that bankruptcy courts should rule in favor of their validity. Break-up fee agreements have often been rejected by bankruptcy courts on the grounds they will decrease the value of a company. However, break-up fee agreements increase the incentive for a potential buyer to bid on a company. Break-up fees are paid by the seller if a transaction fails.

Author: Hebbeln, Mark F.
Publisher: Emory Baptist Church
Publication Name: Bankruptcy Developments Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0890-7862
Year: 1997
Contracts

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Interpretation and construction, Laws, regulations and rules, Bankruptcy law, Priorities of claims and liens, Bankruptcy reorganizations, Bankruptcy reorganization
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The personal jurisdiction effect of notifications of infringement. Overview and statistical study of the law on patent damages
  • Abstracts: The future of law office computing.... FAST help for criminal law practitioners. Corporate cost cutting: how large firms and corporate legal departments can reap the benefits of a software investment
  • Abstracts: DOL proposes class exemption to streamline prohibited transaction exemption process. Proposed PTE would permit sale to party-in-interest to reverse prior prohibited transaction
  • Abstracts: Private annuities: another arrow for your estate planning quiver. Nonqualified variable annuities versus mutual funds
  • Abstracts: Long-term care insurance: a product for today. Genetic information and risk classification in individual life and health insurance
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.