Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The rebirth of the tender offer? Paramount Communications, Inc. v. QVC Network, Inc

Article Abstract:

The defenses available to directors of target corporations in tender offers should be limited to instances where the directors are promoting the shareholders' opportunities to assess other offers. The Delaware Supreme Court's decision in Paramount Communications, Inc. v. QVC Network, Inc. to find a breach of fiduciary duty when the directors of the target company did not allow stockholders to consider the hostile bid was correct. The directors should not have acted to preclude shareholder decision-making. In such instances, directors actions should be limited to corporate planning strategies that will promote long-term value.

Author: Fink, Steven J.
Publisher: Widener University School of Law
Publication Name: Delaware Journal of Corporate Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0364-9490
Year: 1995
Corporate directors, Tender offers (Securities), Tender offers

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Standards of review in conflict transactions: an examination of decisions rendered on motions to dismiss

Article Abstract:

The author examines standards of review for motions to dismiss suits challenging mergers and acquisitions in Delaware since 1983. He concludes that motions to dismiss such suits usually succeed if the corporation in question has some directors who have no potential conflicts of interest.

Author: Lazarus, Lewis H.
Publisher: Widener University School of Law
Publication Name: Delaware Journal of Corporate Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0364-9490
Year: 2001
Standards, Evaluation, Cases, Acquisitions and mergers, Conflict of interests (Agency), Judicial review, Motions (Law), Conflicts of interest

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Reining in good intentions: common law protections of voting rights

Article Abstract:

Courts in Delaware often review the actions of corporate directors in mergers and acquisitions by standards relating to fiduciary duties. Instead, corporate directors engaged in deal protection measures should be reviewed by their actions' effect on stockholders' voting rights.

Author: Alexander, Frederick H.
Publisher: Widener University School of Law
Publication Name: Delaware Journal of Corporate Law
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0364-9490
Year: 2001
Protection and preservation, Voting rights (Stockholders)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Delaware, Fiduciary duties, Business judgment rule
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Effect of asset freeze order on payment of attorney fees: SEC v. Interlink Data Network of Los Angeles, Inc. Insider trading: new SEC rules and an important new case
  • Abstracts: The benefits of branching deregulation. The new safety net
  • Abstracts: Expert opinions put to the test; decision addresses accommodations for disabled. Economic testimony under fire; courts are increasingly finding economists unreliable as expert witnesses
  • Abstracts: Herbal garden of good and evil: the ongoing struggles of dietary supplement regulation. A bridge to far: the EPA's diesel sulfur rule and the increasing cost of fuels regulation under the Clean Air Act
  • Abstracts: The fifty-first session of the UN Commission on Human Rights. The 2000 judicial activity of the International Court of Justice
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.