Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The spike in mergers is prompting U.S. courts to compel corporate parties who have not signed any arbitration agreements to arbitrate international disputes

Article Abstract:

Increased US merger activity have caused federal courts to, in a number of cases, either compel signatories to arbitration agreements to arbitrate with third parties or compel third parties who are not signatories still to participate in arbitration. The courts have recognized five cases in which nonsignatories may be compelled to arbitrate: veil piercing/alter ego, incorporation by reference, conduct, agency and estoppel. Relevant cases and corporate strategies to reduce the chance of litigation on this issue are covered.

Author: Green, Allen B., Boucher, Jamie L.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1998
International mediation, international

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


SEC seeks to update merger rules; the SEC proposes safe harbors to permit communications with stockholders about upcoming mergers or tender offers

Article Abstract:

The SEC's four key proposals for updating merger rules are the expansion of expand communications allowed in tender offers and mergers; the streamlining and updating of tender offer and merger rules; and the reduction of disparate treatment of stock and cash tender offers. The SEC also proposes "free communications" safe harbors, which would permit communications with securities holders about an upcoming tender offer, merger, or other business combination.

Author: Evans, Stephanie C., Cross, Meredith B., Patterson, Roger J.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1999
Planning, United States. Securities and Exchange Commission

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Intellectual property plays major role in mergers; counsel must scrutinize documents, antitrust issues and tax implications

Article Abstract:

Issues concerning the importance of evaluating intellectual property assets in the large number of megamergers common in the late 1990s are discussed. The value of intangible assets such as these are increasingly the driving force behind mergers and assuming a greater roll in terms of assets received.

Author: Bryer, Lanning G., Lebson, Scott J.
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 2000
Economic aspects, Intellectual property

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Acquisitions and mergers
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Treasury announces delay in proposed effective date of proposal making conversion of "large" C corporations to S corporations and further extends proposal
  • Abstracts: There is a developing trend among courts of making choice of forum clauses in franchise agreements presumptively invalid
  • Abstracts: The duty to defend: when does it start? A comparative analysis of post-loss false swearing and its implications for insurance claims settlement practices
  • Abstracts: Latin practices surge, but office openings lag; fragile economies and governments, easy commute, make firms hesitate
  • Abstracts: No special protection for women. Supreme Court didn't kill affirmative action. 3d Circuit eases obstacles to reverse bias lawsuits; the court invalidated an affirmative action plan in one decision and lowered the standard for a prima facie case in another
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.