Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The talk of the 9th: gender bias

Article Abstract:

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Judicial Conference in Aug 1992 featured a report on gender bias in the 9th Circuit, which showed that gender issues effect many aspects of the federal court system. Judicial selection, sexual harassment cases and treatment of female inmates all show the effects of gender bias. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor spoke on federal habeas issues and procedures to handle 11th hour appeals. She said that the report on gender bias was a step in the right direction.

Author: Slind-Flor, Victoria
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1992
Women attorneys, Women lawyers, Sex discrimination against women, Discrimination in justice administration, Justice discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Forfeiture of practice sought

Article Abstract:

Prosecutors are attempting to seize two law practices using drug-trafficking laws of forfeiture. The firms are Hallinan, Poplack and Levine in San Francisco and another in Reno. Lawyers from each firm have been accused of trafficking, money laundering and obstruction of justice. The legality of the seizures has been questioned by lawyers who invoke 6th Amendment rights and claim that law firms do not have marketable value and therefore should not be seized as assets.

Author: Slind-Flor, Victoria
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1993
Law firms, Crime, Forfeiture, Drug traffic

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Judge and arbitrators lock horns; JAMS panelists charge bias and meddling in siding case

Article Abstract:

A federal court has decided that JAMS/Endispute, in charge of the arbitration for parties opting out of the $500 mil settlement of In re Louisiana-Pacific Inner-Seal Siding Litigation, failed to follow its arbitration protocol. Further disputes between the court and JAMS regarding the case resulted in the withdrawal of JAMS. No new ADR provider has yet been chosen.

Author: Slind-Flor, Victoria
Publisher: ALM Media, Inc.
Publication Name: The National Law Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0162-7325
Year: 1997
United States, Cases, Siding (Building materials)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Reports
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: ADR is the better way to settle disputes over Y2K; mediation and arbitration allow parties to control the process in ways that litigation cannot
  • Abstracts: The return of the nativists: inspired by California's Prop. 187, activists seek to tap anti-alien fervor. TV stars, managers tussle; cases reignite criticism of agent laws in New York, California
  • Abstracts: Lack of sleep factors into suits; new trend awakening? Cancer treatment focus of suits; insurers deny coverage
  • Abstracts: Revisiting the 'loser pays' issue; English rule. Doctors' liability considered; 'defensive medicine' is a point of contention
  • Abstracts: The public doesn't really know if the jurors were actually influenced. We chronicle these moments of summer madness to remember not to repeat
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.