Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

The winged gudgeon - an early patent controversy

Article Abstract:

The winged gudgeon was the subject of an early US patent controversy which ultimately led to a libel suit against the US Superintendent of Patents, William Thornton. Thornton, who had originally issued the patent, subsequently decried the actions of patentee Michael Withers. Withers was suing mill operators for royalties based on his patent. Thornton publicly stated that he viewed the patent as invalid. Withers brought a libel suit in 1827, possibly because he may have realized a court could declare the patent invalid and he wanted to find a way to discredit Thornton.

Author: Walterscheid, Edward C.
Publisher: Patent and Trademark Office Society
Publication Name: Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0882-9098
Year: 1997
History, Intellectual property, Mills and mill-work, Mills

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


An economic incentives analysis of the jury's role in patent litigation

Article Abstract:

Jury control devices can be used to promote jury accuracy in identifying the enforceable limits of patents and allowing enforcement up to that limit. From an economic point of view, allowing enforcement up to the enforceable limit promotes the benefits of innovation and licensing and minimizes the inefficiencies of rent seeking, monopoly profits and deterring other innovators. Jury control devices, other than eliminating jury involvement, include jury education, interim summations and improved jury instructions.

Author: Sartori, Michael A.
Publisher: Patent and Trademark Office Society
Publication Name: Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0882-9098
Year: 1997
Analysis, Cases, Law and fact, Jury, Juries

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: United States, Patent law
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The Civil Rights Act of 1991 and less discriminatory alternatives in disparate impact litigation. The Civil Rights Act of 1991: the business necessity standard
  • Abstracts: No way out: an argument against permitting parties to opt out of U.S. securities laws in international transactions
  • Abstracts: The institutional and normative significance of the European Union's Acquired Rights Directive. All aboard the Congressional fast track: from trade to beyond
  • Abstracts: The 8th Circuit's invalidation of Justice Department rules on ex parte contacts with employees of a company under investigation has raised other questions
  • Abstracts: National antitrust laws in a continental economy: a comparison of Canadian and American antitrust laws. part 2
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.