Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Two paths for Ginsburg; the trailblazing women's rights litigator became a moderate judge

Article Abstract:

Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Bill Clinton's nominee to fill Byron White's seat on the US Supreme Court, has been a law professor, lawyer for the ACLU Women's Rights Project, and for the last 13 years judge on the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. As an ACLU advocate, she argued and won landmark women's rights cases before the Supreme Court. Her years as a judge have been marked by a moderate approach and a gift for consensus-building. Clinton's nomination of Ginsburg came at the end of a lengthy process considering, among others, Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt and another federal judge, Stephen Breyer.

Author: Reske, Henry J.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1993
Analysis, Beliefs, opinions and attitudes

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The diverse legacy of Warren Burger

Article Abstract:

Chief Justice Warren Burger left a diverse legacy that defies easy categorization, continually surprising people across the political and social spectrum. Appointed by Richard Nixon to turn back the liberal tide of the Warren Court, Burger hewed a conservative law-and-order line but a liberal and often expansionist social one. Critics say he often voted with the liberal court in order to write the opinion, but even they concede that he brought needed reforms to federal and state court operations.

Author: Reske, Henry J.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1995
Courts, Supreme Court, United States, Judges, Biography, Burger, Warren

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Ginsburg gains easy confirmation; Supreme Court designee discussed abortion, but not the death penalty

Article Abstract:

Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg won both the highest rating from the ABA's Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary and easy confirmation from the Senate's Committee on the Judiciary. She was so uncontroversial that Pennsylvania's Arlen Specter complained the hearings were 'pro forma.' With a Democratic president, Ginsburg felt safe expressing approval for the right to abortion, but was not willing to answer questions on discrimination against gays or the death penalty.

Author: Reske, Henry J.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1993
Political aspects, Appointments, resignations and dismissals

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Officials and employees, Judicial selection, United States. Supreme Court, Ginsburg, Ruth Bader (American Supreme Court justice)
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Winning; succesful strategies from 10 of the nation's leading litigators. He handles surprise and then exploits it
  • Abstracts: 10 innovative tort claims; the NLJ identifies promising modified or new causes of action. Six new ways to win: emerging causes of action: 2001
  • Abstracts: Franchisor's use of RICO: the best defense might be a good offense. Duty of good faith and fair dealing
  • Abstracts: Some reflections on the antitrust treatment of intellectual property. Innovation issues under the 1992 merger guidelines
  • Abstracts: Nine months after the enactment of securities litigation reform, courts are clarifying the new limitations set by the act
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.