Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Uniform Federal Rules of Attorney Conduct: a flawed proposal

Article Abstract:

The Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure of the of the federal courts' Judicial Conference will review in the spring of 1998 proposed limited uniform Federal Rules of Practice and Procedure guiding lawyer conduct. The proposed rules follow increased variances in state law ethics rules and federal agencies' creation of self-standards. Uniform federal rules are advisable for government lawyers. A dynamic conformity rule enforced by state authorities is preferable for other lawyers, many of whom rarely practice in the federal courts.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 1998
Standards, Attorneys, Lawyers, Federal courts

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Federal prosecutors, state ethics regulations, and the McDade Amendment

Article Abstract:

The author argues that the McDade Amendment's extension of state ethics rules to federal prosecutors is too broad and may have an unanticipated negative influence on substantive and procedural federal law largely due to the sanctions attached to ethical violations in some states. The author suggests that judicial and legislative exceptions to state ethics rules should be designed.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 2000
Ethical aspects, Public prosecutors, Government attorneys

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Federal preemption of state law - ERISA - Fifth Circuit upholds state statute allow HMOs to be sued for doctors' negligence

Article Abstract:

The author discusses the US Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit's decision in Corporate Health Insurance, Inc. v. Texas Department of Insurance, in which the court upheld a state law permitting patients to sue HMOs for negligent care.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 2001
Cases, Malpractice, Health maintenance organizations, Exclusive and concurrent legislative powers, Preemption (Legislative power), Case Note

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Legal ethics
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Hiring without a net; firms need to check coverage on new attorneys with old lawsuits. Playing to the bench
  • Abstracts: Loopholes in the secondary boycott ban. Blame the Shermans. Sending truckers down a slippery slope
  • Abstracts: Deregulatory takings and breach of the regulatory contract: a comment. The global Fifth Amendment? NAFTA's investment protections and the misguided quest for an international "regulatory takings" doctrine
  • Abstracts: Patent, trademark data bases to appear online; lawyers yawn. New tech helps curb legal fees; providers are devising techniques to assist corporate secretaries and in-house lawyers in managing law firms
  • Abstracts: The implementation of constitutional rights: insights from law and economics. Making government pay: markets, politics, and the allocation of constitutional costs
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.