Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

What happened to crime? Why politicians don't want to talk about it anymore

Article Abstract:

President Bill Clinton's election campaign was the first in some time that did not play on the public's fear of crime by preaching law and order, but the crime bill he has offered since being elected offers little change. Attorney General Janet Reno's promise to reevaluate mandatory minimum sentences, the only potentially substantive change, was not included in the bill. During the 1980's the country's prison population went up sharply and the streets became no safer. More emphasis on real solutions is needed.

Author: Harris, David A.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1993
Law enforcement, Public opinion, Criminal justice, Administration of, Administration of criminal justice, Fear of crime

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Prearrest silence as evidence of guilt: what you don't say shouldn't be used against you

Article Abstract:

Prosecutors who suggest that a defendant's prearrest silence provides evidence of guilt are in violation of the Fifth Amendment. The impermissible burden test should be used rather than the decision in Griffin v. California as a basis for exclusion of the substantive use of prearrest silence as evidence of guilt. The ruling in Jenkins v. Anderson applies only to impeachment use of prearrest silence, which should be distinguished from substantive use of prearrest silence.

Author: Notz, Jane Elinor
Publisher: University of Chicago Law School
Publication Name: University of Chicago Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0041-9494
Year: 1997
United States, Silence (Law), Self-incrimination, Self incrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Seeing isn't always believing; a video does not a verdict make

Article Abstract:

Observers of a case such as Rodney King's in which a videotape seems to militate in favor of the prosecution should not necessarily be surprised if the prosecution fails to win its case. The videotape is only one part of the evidence and the jury, which has been privy to the whole trial, may have good reasons for its decision.

Author: Harris, David A.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1992
Usage, Video tapes in courtroom proceedings, Video evidence

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Analysis, Evidence, Criminal, Criminal evidence
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Hey, you! Speak up - clearly - if you want to talk to computers. Advertisers now litigating rivals' fishy claims; traditional private dispute resolution, though cheaper, becomes less popular
  • Abstracts: Creating competition policy: Betty Bock and the development of antitrust institutions. The quality of appointments and the capability of the Federal Trade Commission
  • Abstracts: The end of New York Times v Sullivan: reflections on Masson v New Yorker Magazine. Dun & Bradstreet, Hepps and Milkovich: the lingering confusion in defamation law
  • Abstracts: The First Amendment and compulsory funding of student government political resolutions at state universities. Price fixing among elite colleges and universities
  • Abstracts: Fusion and the associational rights of minor political parties. Treaty-based rights and remedies of individuals
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.