Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Back to work; job bias is at issue in three cases on the Court's expanded docket

Article Abstract:

Some employment discrimination cases on the Supreme Court's 2001-2002 docket are discussed. Three of the cases will determine the rights of workers with repetitive stress injuries who sign arbitration agreements, with two also posing the question of who is disabled.

Author: Savage, David G.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 2001

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Workplace bias to the fore: Court to rule on factoring race into employment decisions

Article Abstract:

The US Supreme Court must determine whether employers can use race in decision-making that is not remedial in Piscataway Township Board of Education v. Taxman. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 supports affirmative action that serves to make reparations for racial segregation but, in cases where the work force is already diverse, the Court must decide whether race can be a factor in choosing who, of two equally senior and qualified employees, gets laid off. Other issues the Court will address in its 1997-1998 term are discussed.

Author: Savage, David G.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1997
Courts, Supreme Court, Reverse discrimination, Sex discrimination, Race discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Differently disabled; scope of coverage is at core of three ADA lawsuits

Article Abstract:

The three Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) cases before the US Supreme Court in the 1998-99 term deal with the law's applicability to those with treatable physical impairments. The ADA bars employment discrimination against qualified parties with disabilities. Critics say that the weak vision afflicting plaintiffs in one of the cases is too common to qualify as a disability, and the hypertension of another plaintiff, although more serious, is not truly disabling.

Author: Savage, David G.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1999
Laws, regulations and rules, Discrimination against disabled persons, Handicapped discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases, Employment, Disabled persons, Employment discrimination
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Quarterly survey of SEC rulemaking and major appellate decisions
  • Abstracts: Playing by the same rules; measure confirms that federal prosecutors are not immune to state professional conduct regulations
  • Abstracts: Supreme Court hands windfall to owners of insolvent S corporations. Debt discharge controversy for owners of S corporations
  • Abstracts: Double speak: two reviewers share their opinions on Dragon NaturallySpeaking voice recognition software. When presentation is everything: Dreamweaver and GoLive go head-to-head to get you on the Web
  • Abstracts: Remedy is touchy Microsoft question; most mumble when asked what Justice should do if it wins
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.