Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Law

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Law

Yes: each chamber can adopt its own procedures

Article Abstract:

Requiring a supermajority vote for tax hikes is constitutional and consistent with majority control and with the separation of powers. A legislative rule not subject to repeal by a majority would be unconstitutional because it would act as a constitutional amendment. Along with being constitutional, the supermajority rule is also good policy. For the last 50 years, the US has faced the situation of interest groups being able to obtain benefits which a diffuse majority paid for. The super-majority rule is an attempt to restore majority power without the radical step of a constitutional amendment.

Author: McGinnis, John O., Rappaport, Michael B.
Publisher: American Bar Association
Publication Name: ABA Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0747-0088
Year: 1997
Laws, regulations and rules, Practice, United States. Congress, Representative government and representation, Representative government, Majorities

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Vocabulary of ADR procedures

Article Abstract:

Terms used in describing ADR techniques must be similarly understood by all who use them. Terms include non-binding arbitration, binding arbitration, court-annexed arbitration, caucus arbitration, "baseball" or "final-offer" arbitration and Mediation and Last Offer Arbitration (MEDALOA). Non-binding arbitration, for example, is moderately formal and rarely includes live witnesses. Binding arbitration is a formal presentation where the binding award is enforceable in court.

Author: Arnold, Tom
Publisher: American Arbitration Association
Publication Name: Dispute Resolution Journal
Subject: Law
ISSN: 1074-8105
Year: 1996
Terminology, Dispute resolution (Law)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Examining senate procedures through narrative

Article Abstract:

Many legal scholars advocate for reforms to Congress's lawmaking power because they believe it no longer responds to the popular majority. However, this is a mistaken belief that could be corrected by a study of Congress using narrative. A study of procedure in the US Senate is presented as an example.

Publisher: Harvard Law Review Association
Publication Name: Harvard Law Review
Subject: Law
ISSN: 0017-811X
Year: 2003
Legislative Bodies, US Senate, Study and teaching, Democracy, United States. Congress. Senate, Parliamentary procedure, Narratives

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: HSC "cannot cope" with new pressures caused by government spending cuts. Council pays social worker 66,000 pounds sterling for work stress caused by "bullying" boss
  • Abstracts: Organizing worth its salt: the protected status of paid union organizers. Milking capitalism for all it's worth
  • Abstracts: A "shell" corp. may be a good devisee of contaminated realty. Good prospects for growth in 1995
  • Abstracts: Some unhealthy aspects of managed health care. Big picture; dealing with the business side of art. Dealing with the AMT aspects of the kiddie tax rules
  • Abstracts: Adam Smith on monopoly: the 'mean rapacity, the monopolizing spirit.' (excerpts from 'The Wealth of Nations') Critical praxis, spirit healing, and community activism: preserving a subersive dialogue on reparations
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.