Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Library and information science

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Library and information science

Computers, copyright and substantial similarity: the test reconsidered

Article Abstract:

The comparison stage of the abstraction-filtration-comparison test enumerated in Computer Associates International v. Altai, Inc. should be revised to focus on the intended audience of a copyrighted product and not the perceptions of experts. The Altai decision set forth a test for determining whether one computer program was substantially similar to another, constituting copyright infringement. The decision focused on the use of expert evidence, but the proper inquiry is whether the lay user perceives the works as being substantially similar.

Author: Coulter, Jeffrey D.
Publisher: John Marshall Law School
Publication Name: The John Marshall Journal of Computer & Information Law
Subject: Library and information science
ISSN: 1078-4128
Year: 1995
Software, Evidence, Expert, Expert evidence

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Revising the copyright law for electronic publishing

Article Abstract:

Innovations in electronic publishing and the costless transmission of information do not dictate that copyright laws be completely overhauled. While changes in the nature of "writings" do call for copyright to adapt to these new media, the principle of protecting the author of a copyrighted work still apply. The changes that may be needed should focus on preserving property rights while considering the interests of system operators, librarians, World Wide Web providers and personal computer users.

Author: Loundy, David J.
Publisher: John Marshall Law School
Publication Name: The John Marshall Journal of Computer & Information Law
Subject: Library and information science
ISSN: 1078-4128
Year: 1995
Analysis, Electronic publishing, Data processing, Copyright infringement, Copyright and electronic data processing

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Potential liability under the Illinois Electronic Commerce Security Act: Is it a risk worth taking?

Article Abstract:

The legal liability problems created for users of digital signatures under the Illinois Electronic Commerce Security Act are discussed. Topics include the standard of care attached to signature devices, the problem of proving a signature is false, liability of recipients, advantages of the notarization process and paper documents, and proposed amendments to the Act.

Author: Myers, Stephen G,
Publisher: John Marshall Law School
Publication Name: The John Marshall Journal of Computer & Information Law
Subject: Library and information science
ISSN: 1078-4128
Year: 1999
Illinois, Electronic commerce, E-commerce, Digital signatures, Digital signatures (Authentication), Confidential communications, Liability (Law), Legal liability, Notaries

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Copyright, Copyrights
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Efficiency versus social optimality: the case of telecommunications pricing. The determinants of market share for the 'dominant firm' in telecommunications
  • Abstracts: Competition to international satellite communications services. Optimal pricing of telephone usage: an econometric implementation
  • Abstracts: Thermal imaging and the Fourth Amendment: Pushing the Katz test towards terminal velocity. Warrantless satellite surveillance: will our 4th Amendment privacy rights be lost in space?
  • Abstracts: A normative regulatory framework for computer matching. The invention and future of the computer. How can Whelan v. Jaslow and Lotus v. Borland both be right? Reexamining the economics of computer software reuse
  • Abstracts: Use tax collection on Internet purchases: should the mail order industry serve as a model? Attorney advertising and solicitation on the Internet: complying with ethics regulations and netiquette
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.