Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Literature/writing

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Literature/writing

Anti-homosexuality advocate fails in bid to overturn state's criminal libel law

Article Abstract:

The US Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit ruled in Phelps v. Hamilton that a Kansas criminal defamation statute was constitutional if interpreted to require a showing of actual malice. Criminal defamation charges were brought against anti-homosexuality activist Fred Phelps by Topeka DA Joan Hamilton for statements made about a deceased gay man. Along with upholding the statute, the 10th Circuit found that the US district court should not have intervened in the state criminal action. The case was remanded to determine whether Phelps could prove harassment or bad faith by Hamilton.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1995
Gays, United States, Crimes against, Kansas, Phelps, Fred

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Court upholds law banning content rules for films

Article Abstract:

The US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit has upheld the prohibition under the Foreign Relations Authorization Act of 1991 that prevents the US Information Agency (USIA) from creating content-based rules for educational films and ordered the agency to reconsider films it refused to certify under old regulations. The USIA has conceded that under the new law it can no longer label films as propaganda, or deny certification to films for presenting only one or limited viewpoints or using out-of-date facts.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1992
Powers and duties, Motion pictures, Movies, United States. Information Agency, Censorship

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Criminal libel law found overbroad

Article Abstract:

The US District Court of South Carolina has declared the South Carolina criminal libel law unconstitutional in Fitts v Kolb. The court stated that the libel law's term 'malicious intent' did not mean 'actual malice' and could be interpreted to mean that criminal damages could be levied against constitutionally protected speech. Therefore, because the law did not define 'malicious' as required constitutionally, the law is overbroad and unconstitutional.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1992

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Interpretation and construction, Cases, Libel and slander, Freedom of speech
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Aging citizens. Federal data highlight state hit-and-run trend
  • Abstracts: Census U.S. data can provide insight for international story angles. International coverage on a hometown budget
  • Abstracts: Census U.S. data can provide insight for international story angles. part 2 What's ahead? Census data key to government actions of the next decade
  • Abstracts: Golf stadium stumble. Fatalities lead newspaper to study stretch of interstate
  • Abstracts: Damages for broken promise upheld. State's 'due process' right doesn't trump shield law. Naming source not waiver of privilege
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.