Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Literature/writing

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Literature/writing

Ban of 'harmful matter' in newsracks upheld

Article Abstract:

The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld a California statute that banned sale of publications that contained harmful matter in vending machines in public places. Harmful matter was defined to be depicting sexual activity and lacking other value. Publishers, a consumer and a newsrack company filed suit claiming that the law was an unconstitutional restriction of free speech. The Court applied the higher content-based standard for restrictions on speech and found the law constitutional because it served a compelling interest, protecting children, and there was no less restrictive way to carry out that goal.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1996
California, Media coverage, Obscenity (Law), Obscenity

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


City can ban newsracks

Article Abstract:

The US Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit reversed the lower court in Gold Coast Publications, Inc. v. Corrigan and found that a municipal ordinance in Coral Gables, FL that dictated the design and color of newsracks was constitutional. The newspaper had argued that the restriction violated the First Amendment, was a prior restraint and violated trademark law by not allowing the newspaper to use its trade dress. The 11th Circuit applied the commercial speech test and found that the city did have an interest in minimizing blight and that the ordinance was narrowly tailored.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1996
Cases, Trademarks, Commercial speech doctrine

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Beacon Hill 'street furniture' ban upheld as constitutional

Article Abstract:

The US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit ruled in Globe Newspaper v. Beacon Hill Architectural Commission that a ban on all street furniture in the historical district was a content-neutral restriction that was narrowly-tailored to serve a substantial government interest. Newspapers argued that the ban, which covered newsracks as well as other items, violated the First Amendment. The Court emphasize that other methods of distribution, such as street vendors, stores and home delivery, were unaffected by the regulations.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1997
Massachusetts, Historic districts

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Freedom of the press, Newspaper vending machines
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Gripen makes debut in United States. V-22's hydraulics under scrutiny after new leak
  • Abstracts: LSST--The dark matter telescope. CERN and the LHC
  • Abstracts: Confrontational interviews. Dealing with sensitive issues
  • Abstracts: New tactics: Difficulties loom for journalists covering upcoming election bids. Selective disclosure: trolling for whispers, earnings and access
  • Abstracts: Bad air investigating pollution: dirty deals in reshaping economy, county eases way for diesel truck pollution
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.