Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Literature/writing

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Literature/writing

Court overturns fines against reporter

Article Abstract:

The Vermont Supreme Court overturned a trial court ruling in Vermont v. Gundlah ex rel. Smallheer, saying that reporter Susan Smallheer did not have to pay legal fees and prospective contempt fines for her refusal to give evidence in a criminal trial. The court said Vermont procedure requires each side to pay its own legal fees except in the case of frivolous litigation. Prospective contempt fines were held inappropriate because there was no Vermont precedent on journalistic privilege when they were imposed.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1993
Cases, Attorneys, Lawyers' fees, Fines (Penalties)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Court finds reporter's privilege only when media being harassed

Article Abstract:

The US Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit ruled in United States v. Smith that a television station must respond to a subpoena by a federal prosecutor for nonconfidential outtakes, as the First Amendment only protected the press against subpoenas used to harass its members. The court ruled that the information's availability from other sources was irrelevant since that information was not protected by the qualified reporter's privilege.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1998

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Court reaffirms qualified reporter's privilege for nonconfidential information: but panel lowers the standard parties must meet

Article Abstract:

The US Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit ruled in Gonzales v. National Broadcasting Co. that the journalists' privilege for nonconfidential information is qualified and set a lower standard for overcoming this privilege, in contrast to confidential information where the standard is higher and more difficult to overcome.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1999

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Confidential communications, Journalistic privilege, United States
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Appeal court recognizes reporter's privilege in trucking suit. Iowa high court extends privilege to criminal cases, grand juries
  • Abstracts: Courts back refusal to release Hoffa files. High court finds no privilege in airport expansion records
  • Abstracts: Courts back refusal to release Hoffa files. Federal law does not require release of drug testing data. Disclosure of police discipline records uneven: courts in Massachusetts, Ohio allow access; California says no
  • Abstracts: RICO suit by Tilton, church against 'PrimeTime Live' fails. ABC, Philip Morris settle 'spiking' case
  • Abstracts: "The rights of the player": evidence of mimi and histriones in early medieval Scandinavia. Cathedral chapter and town council: cooperative ceremony and drama in medieval Rouen
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.