Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Literature/writing

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Literature/writing

Customs cannot withhold Perot records automatically: 'policy' of exempting entire categories narrowed by court ruling

Article Abstract:

The US Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled in The Nation Magazine v. United States Customs Service that the agency's categorical approach to denying access to investigatory files violated the Freedom of Information Act. The magazine attempted to gain access to Customs investigatory files to confirm whether H. Ross Perot had provide them with drug interdiction help. The Customs Service would not say whether the records existed, but said that if they did they would be exempt from disclosure. The court found that the public interest outweighed any remaining privacy interest.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1996
Perot, H. Ross

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Conference suggests making FOIA inapplicable to agency documents prepared for ADR

Article Abstract:

The Administrative Conference of the United States voted to recommend that the Administrative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Act be amended to read that records in dispute resolution proceedings involving the government be exempt from Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) disclosure when the materials were generated in anticipation of the proceeding. The ADR Act governs dispute resolution in which the government is a party or a facilitator. The Act was characterized as at odds with FOIA by media representatives who argued against broad exceptions to the FOIA presumptions of disclosure.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1995
Reports, Administrative procedure, United States. Administrative Conference

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


State keeps abuse complaint, investigation reports secret

Article Abstract:

The South Carolina Supreme Court ruled in Beattie v. Aiken City Department of Social Services that parents that had been investigated for child abuse had no right to access to complaint records. The allegations were determined to be unfounded, but the Beatties believed that the head of the agency initiated the investigation as some form of revenge. The Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's denial of access based on a freedom of information exemption but suggested that in camera review by the trial court was not precluded.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1996
South Carolina, Social work, Confidential communications, Child welfare workers

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Laws, regulations and rules, Records and correspondence, Freedom of information
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Laws barring witnesses, jurors from selling stories ruled unconstitutional. 'Notice of claim' not subject to exemption
  • Abstracts: New Era cannot keep donor records secret. Restraining order against newspaper allowed to stand
  • Abstracts: Rape victim's identity ruled matter of public concern. Indictment over rape report is dismissed
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.