Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Literature/writing

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Literature/writing

Five-year study shows media subpoenas on the rise: responding news organizations received 3,519 subpoenas in 1993

Article Abstract:

A survey of 900 news organizations revealed that 81% of broadcasters and 42% of newspapers received subpoenas during the five years from 1989 to 1993. A total of 3,519 subpoenas was reported. The majority of subpoenas were complied with, but when the press organization chose to fight, the media won 81% of the subpoena motions. Among the subpoenas, 25% were requests for broadcasted material, 16% were requests for raw tape, 12% requested published articles and 11% requested notes. Confidential sources and information were sought in only 3.8% of subpoenas.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1995
United States, Usage, Subpoena

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Bid to enforce subpoenas shows Fleming's contempt

Article Abstract:

The Senate's Temporary Special Independent Counsel Peter Fleming, in his investigation of classified information leaks, subpoenaed five journalists. Fleming claimed the leaks violated the Privacy Act or 18 USC 641 and, therefore, the press should obey the subpoenas. Fleming not only asked for the journalists' sources but also for explanations of what he believed were discrepancies in their stories with what was reported and for their telephone records. The Senate, however, did not support Fleming and the subpoenas were not enforced.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1992
Laws, regulations and rules, Investigations, Political aspects, Freedom of the press, Governmental investigations, Government investigations, Fleming, Peter E.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Search effort rebuffed, prosecutor subpoenas photos

Article Abstract:

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled that unpublished photographs are not protected by the state's press shield law as a confidential source. A news photographer, who took pictures of a labor dispute where a man was arrested for assaulting police officers, was subpoenaed to turn over the photographs after her editor refused to permit a warranted search. The court ordered the photographer to comply with the subpoena, but the newspaper is considering an appeal.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1992
Cases, Photographs

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Confidential communications, Journalistic privilege
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Dear Analog: a history of brass tacks. Stemming the tide of aging and disease. Brain-machine interfaces
  • Abstracts: Seafood safety. Managing the reporting process includes self-imposed hurdles. Fundamentalism: Knowing history, culture help in tracking paper, people trails
  • Abstracts: A nation without nationalism: The reorganization of feeling in Austen's 'Persuasion'. Austen's powers: engaging with Adam Smith in debates about wealth and virtue
  • Abstracts: NLRB ISO "blind box" advertiser. Food Lion must withdraw subpoenas for reporters' records; demands for phone, hotel, courier records infringe on First Amendment rights
  • Abstracts: Police may withhold victims' addresses, despite requirement to disclose "location of occurrence."(Indiana) School must disclose animal research data
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.