Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Literature/writing

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Literature/writing

Florida retreats from ruling on records

Article Abstract:

The Florida Supreme Court, in Nov 1991, had ruled that the state's open records act applied only to legislatively-created agencies and not to constitutionally-created bodies. Because of confusion over the status of some agencies, Florida's attorney general asked for clarification. The court issued a new decision in Feb 1992, stating the act applied to executive branch agencies and entities under legislative control, but not to the legislature or its members. An amendment to the Florida Constitution, to make the act apply to all agencies regardless of governmental branch is on the 1992 ballot.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1992

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Clemency records not subject to disclosure

Article Abstract:

The Florida Supreme Court ruled in Parole Commission v. Lockett that clemency records were not governed by Florida's open records law. Since clemency power resides in the executive branch, the open records law cannot apply without violation of the separation of powers principle. Similarly, the judiciary would violate the same principle by ordering the commission to produce the files. Therefore, the Florida Parole Commission could not be forced to supply convicted child molester and murderer James Duckett with copies of his records which were missing from the state attorney's files.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1993
Records and correspondence, Parole officers

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Georgia Supreme Court opens student records

Article Abstract:

The Georgia Supreme Court in Red & Black Publishing Co. v. Board of Regents of the University of Georgia gave a student newspaper access to the records of a student-run disciplinary court on a fraternity hazing incident under investigation. The ruling in favor of the student newspaper came because the university was considered a state agency subject to Georgia open government laws.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1993
Laws, regulations and rules, Administrative agencies, Government agencies, Public universities and colleges

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Cases, Public records, Separation of powers, Access control
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Crooks cited bogus Pentagon reports. Plane makers bought suspect parts by the thousands
  • Abstracts: Two courts find newsworthiness outweighs privacy interests. Public school employee personnel records must be disclosed
  • Abstracts: Court approves closing of jury selection. Maryland court strikes down trial closure. Courts allow order requiring journalists to sign secrecy agreement
  • Abstracts: Judges ease restrictions on cameras in courts. Judges consider camera access to courts. New York votes cameras back into state courts
  • Abstracts: FBI used reporter's name to talk to spy. Senate resolution would require media disclosure of speaking fees, other income
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.