Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Literature/writing

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Literature/writing

'Seinfeld' quiz book violates producers' copyrights in show

Article Abstract:

The US 2d Circuit Court of Appeals stated the Carol Publishing Company violated copyright law when it issued a book entitled "The Seinfeld Aptitude Test." The book used material that appeared on the "Seinfeld" television show, which was produced by Castle Rock Entertainment. The federal District Court in New York granted summary judgment in favor of Castle Rock Entertainment. The appellate court upheld the decision, stating the book copied material that originally sprang from the television show's creators.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1998
Copyright, Copyrights, Performing arts, Seinfeld (Television program)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


'Son of Sam' royalties law violates First Amendment

Article Abstract:

The Rhode Island Supreme Court ruled that the Criminal Royalties Distribution Act was unconstitutional because it is content-specific and therefore restricts protected First Amendment speech. The state law attempts to compensate the victims and prevent the criminal from profiting from the crime. However, the court found that it was not the best way to meet the state's interest because it focused on profits from an expressive activity rather than all of the criminal's assets.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1997
Interpretation and construction, Constitutional law, Constitutional interpretation, Restitution, Rhode Island, Son of Sam laws

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Author owed more explanation on 'national security' denial

Article Abstract:

The US Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit ruled in Halpern v. FBI that a request for law enforcement records under the Freedom of Information Act, refused for national security reasons, should get attentive government consideration but that the government need not be specific in its refusal. The appeals court also ruled that any FBI record was a law enforcement record, even if the investigation it describes turns out to be without merit.

Publisher: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Publication Name: News Media & the Law
Subject: Literature/writing
ISSN: 0149-0737
Year: 1999
Freedom of information, Security classification (Government documents)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Cases
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Newspaper averts restraint requested by Church of Scientology over copyright claim. King estate's copyright in 'Dream' speech upheld on appeal
  • Abstracts: Damages for broken promise upheld. State's 'due process' right doesn't trump shield law. Naming source not waiver of privilege
  • Abstracts: O.J. Simpson trial parody barred for use of Seuss' copyrighted material. Postal inspectors barred from posing as journalists: some federal agencies still allow media impersonation
  • Abstracts: 'Fair report' privilege recognized for coverage of official proceedings: right was implied in earlier case. Wiretap law of place of injury applies to interstate call
  • Abstracts: City boycott of newspaper does not violate publisher's constitutional rights: Oakland Council was not acting as regulator, court finds
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.