Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Military and naval science

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Military and naval science

Armour for the XXI century

Article Abstract:

The ABRAMS battle tank is expected to remain in the future as a capable tank. The tank's newest M1A2 version, which was deployed in 1994 and weighing 69.5 tons combat loaded, features significant enhancements including dual-redundant power and data bus architecture which allows for an inter- and intra-vehicular information system and enables data transfer tank-to-tank through voice and non-voice channels. Its other features include inertial position navigation system and the so-called hunter-killer independent thermal viewer. For the future, the TACOM has come up with a model for the notional Future Land Combat System Concept Vehicle, the XM291.

Author: Wiedewitsch, Jerry L., Marrero, Pedro, Beauchamp, Roy
Publisher: Monch Publishing Group
Publication Name: Military Technology
Subject: Military and naval science
ISSN: 0722-3226
Year: 1998
Product information, Med & Heavy Tanks, Military Armored Vehicle, Tank, and Tank Component Manufacturing, Article, ABRAMS, M1A2, XM291

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


US Armour in combat: the Iraqi lessons

Article Abstract:

The experiences of deployment of heavy Armour (M1A1 ABRAMS MBTs and M2A2/M3A2 BRADLEY IFVs/CFs) and their survival capabilities during Operation Iraqi Freedom are analyzed. The ABRAMS tank performed very well in providing excellent maneuver, firepower and overall crew protection, but few areas like side and rear armour protection, wartime ASl/PLL authorization, stowage plans and suspension durability requires some improvement.

Publisher: Monch Publishing Group
Publication Name: Military Technology
Subject: Military and naval science
ISSN: 0722-3226
Year: 2003

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Quo vadis, Armour?

Article Abstract:

The current and future role of armored unit, which includes both light and heavy Armored Fighting Vehicle (AFVs), the lessons learnt at the end of the cold war and the country's current armour procurement and modernization plans are discussed. Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France and Italy are some of the countries that have submitted their views about the armour.

Publisher: Monch Publishing Group
Publication Name: Military Technology
Subject: Military and naval science
ISSN: 0722-3226
Year: 2003
Finland, Australia, Denmark, Belgium

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: United States, Usage, Armored military vehicles, Armored vehicles, Military, Combat effectiveness, Armoured military vehicles
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: A warrior for the 21st century. Not that bad, really. Jerusalem of gold
  • Abstracts: Winning the peace: A rucksack for OOTW. 21st century air combat training systems. Laser projection technology: Taking visual simulation to a new level of realism
  • Abstracts: The Air Base concept for the future. French Artillery: the revolution is on
  • Abstracts: Proportionality in the law of war. Sustained security operations in the combat zone. A cooperative strategy for 21st century seapower
  • Abstracts: Cries of the hunchback: Is space a theatre of war or a sanctuary? Piracy threat dictates need for intelligence-led solution
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.