Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Military and naval science

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Military and naval science

British Army decides to keep its heavy armor for extra decade

Article Abstract:

The British Army has planned to keep the existing heavy-force capability in service for another 30 years, as the out-of-service date (OSD) of the army's Challenger 2 tanks and Warrior infantry combat vehicles (ICV) have decreased from 2025 to 2035. The reasons behind the postponement and the future plans for the armored vehicles are discussed.

Author: Pengelley, Rupert
Publisher: Jane's Information Group
Publication Name: Jane's International Defense Review
Subject: Military and naval science
ISSN: 0020-6512
Year: 2005
Usage, Armored vehicles, Armoured vehicles

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


UK faces up to further shake-up in armored vehicle planning

Article Abstract:

Operational experience and continuing budgetary pressures are forcing changes in the British Army armored vehicle planning. The existing planning figure for Future Rapid Effect System is 3,775 vehicles fulfilling 17 roles, but the size of the fleet might have to be decreased.

Author: Pengelley, Rupert
Publisher: Jane's Information Group
Publication Name: Jane's International Defense Review
Subject: Military and naval science
ISSN: 0020-6512
Year: 2006
Government expenditures, Armored military vehicles, Armored vehicles, Military, Government finance, Armoured military vehicles

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: United Kingdom, Planning, Equipment and supplies, United Kingdom. Army, Company business planning
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: NLOS-C reaches a munitions milestone with 1,000 firings. Transition of Challenger 2 to smoothbore armament reaches significant landmark
  • Abstracts: Transitioning from conventional combat. Generation to generation: The combat development trust
  • Abstracts: Military trucks revisited (I). Combat engineer equipment revisited. Engineer equipment for expeditionary operations (I)
  • Abstracts: Army needs to think about future RF threat, says PEO IEW and S. US Army tests WIN-T
  • Abstracts: Stand-in jammer needs more funding. On the prowl
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.