Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

News, opinion and commentary

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » News, opinion and commentary

At issue: is a federally funded program the best way to provide long-term care for the elderly?

Article Abstract:

The pros and cons of instituting a federally financed program for long-term health care for the aged are presented. The main point going for the program is the political benefits that could be attained by the government in the long run considering that the elderly have become a potent political force in society. A contrary view believes that health care is the proper domain of insurance companies and families have to be wise enough to purchase insurance early in life to take advantage of the low rates. In this arrangement, government could contribute by encouraging families to avail of insurance policies.

Author: Butler, Stuart M., Rockfeller, John D., IV
Publisher: Congressional Quarterly, Inc.
Publication Name: CQ Researcher
Subject: News, opinion and commentary
ISSN: 1056-2036
Year: 1992
Finance, Medical care

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Prison health care: Aging behind bars

Article Abstract:

The health care costs would continue to rise as the prison population ages but the big question is where the money would come from. Longer periods of prison sentences are becoming expensive as the average of housing an elderly inmate is estimated at $70,000 annually, which is three times the cost of a younger inmate, and it is suggested that programs such as compassionate early release for sick persons be introduced to address the problem of aging behind bars and its high costs.

Publisher: Congressional Quarterly, Inc.
Publication Name: CQ Researcher
Subject: News, opinion and commentary
ISSN: 1056-2036
Year: 2007
United States, Forecasts, trends, outlooks, Health aspects, Forecasts and trends, Prison administration, Market trend/market analysis, Medical care, Cost of, Health care costs

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Does federally mandated "gender equity" in sports discriminate against male athletes?

Article Abstract:

Disagreement exists on whether the federal mandate of sports' "gender equity" discriminates against men. The mandate comes from Title IX of the 1972 Education Amendments. Critics claim that school sports programs which are all-male are in jeopardy due to federal quotas. However, supporters note that quotas are set by schools, not federal administrators, and Title IX is intended to eliminate quotas which discriminate against women.

Author: Kerr, T.J., Collins, Cardiss
Publisher: Congressional Quarterly, Inc.
Publication Name: CQ Researcher
Subject: News, opinion and commentary
ISSN: 1056-2036
Year: 1997
Laws, regulations and rules, Political aspects, Women athletes, Discrimination in sports, Sports discrimination

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Care and treatment, Aged, Elderly
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Russia and the former Soviet Republics: Power of the people? Russia and the former Soviet Republics: 'Potemkin democracy'
  • Abstracts: A two-tiered workforce: the UPS strike signalled a growing push to improve conditions for part-timers. Politics for profit
  • Abstracts: Cherchez la femme in the presidential race. How to preserve the health-care safety net. Firing a 'hooker' is an employer's right
  • Abstracts: Anti-abuse efforts. At issue: is parents' behavior to blame for the nation's high rate of infant mortality? Attitudes of parents
  • Abstracts: Sex-education programs that work - and some that don't. Manmade hearts that work. The brain reveals its powers
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.