Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

News, opinion and commentary

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » News, opinion and commentary

Chips and Technologies is target of suit by Intel

Article Abstract:

Intel Corp has filed a patent infringement law suit against Chips and Technologies Inc and is requesting damages and an injunction to prevent Chips and Technologies from selling its versions of Intel's 80386 and 80387 processors. Intel is also requesting a temporary restraining order to keep Chips and Technologies from being able to move its technology to another company, thereby preventing any manufacture of the microchip. Chips and Technologies does not own its own factories and must farm out its manufacturing. While Chips and Technologies insists it has infringed no patents, Intel has been aggressive in attempting to enforce its patents and copyrights through law suits. If Intel is successful in its suit, Chips and Technologies may not survive since its major income is derived from the 80386 chip. Chips and Technologies may transfer its manufacturing to a company with a cross-licensing agreement with Intel.

Author: Pollack, Andrew
Publisher: The New York Times Company
Publication Name: The New York Times
Subject: News, opinion and commentary
ISSN: 0362-4331
Year: 1992
Computer peripheral equipment, not elsewhere classified, Computer integrated systems design, Intellectual property, Patents, Competition, Patent, Chips and Technologies Inc., CHPS, Intel 80387 (Coprocessor)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Decision mixed over Intel chip; but Advanced Micro entitled to damages

Article Abstract:

Intel Corp and Advanced Micro Devices Inc battle over the rights to Intel Corp's 80386 microprocessor chip. The 80386 is the heart of many new microcomputers and is expected to yield around $1 billion in revenues for Intel in 1990. Judge J. Barton Phelps, an arbitrator in the case, criticizes both companies. Intel is criticized for duplicity and a breach of contract with Advanced Micro Devices, a judgment that allows Advanced Micro Devices to collect damages. Advanced Micro Devices is criticized for unremitting vindictiveness and for a failure to produce a satisfactory clone for the 80386. The arbitration will continue in Nov 1990 and is expected to last through 1991.

Author: Pollack, Andrew
Publisher: The New York Times Company
Publication Name: The New York Times
Subject: News, opinion and commentary
ISSN: 0362-4331
Year: 1990
Microprocessor, CPUs (Central processing units), Microprocessors, Advanced Micro Devices Inc., AMD, Legal Issues, Semiconductor Industry

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: Semiconductor industry, Cases, Intel Corp., INTC, Lawsuits, Intel 80386 (Microprocessor)
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Microchip Technology names new president. Advanced Micro moves to fill president's post. Vice president named to Intel's top team
  • Abstracts: Advanced Micro set to send out new chip. Advanced Micro posts record quarter sales
  • Abstracts: A.T.& T. and NCR hold talks: no accord announced; no further meetings are said to be planned
  • Abstracts: Can cellular phone companies agree on a new standard for transmission? One technique was a front-runner, but a new one could handle many more calls
  • Abstracts: High hopes for the new OS/2. Why Compaq is getting down in the trenches
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.