Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

News, opinion and commentary

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » News, opinion and commentary

Computer words: less perfect?

Article Abstract:

Writers using word processors may employ less care and thought than those using traditional methods because of the ease with which work can be composed on computer systems. Some educators feel that the increased facility for editing and reorganization available through word processors and the automatic checking of spelling and grammar may encourage less painstaking writing. In 1990, university teacher Marcia Peoples Halio reported that students in English classes using MS-DOS-based microcomputers wrote better essays than those in classes using Apple Macintoshes. The Apple Macintosh students chose more trivial subjects, were more sloppy with grammar, punctuation and spelling and composed sentences that were shorter and less complex. Presuming that each group of students had equal skills, she attributed this to the then-great difference between the point-and-click, graphical environment of the Macintosh and the typewriter style of DOS text systems. In the absence of further studies, and with more similarity between computer systems, the emphasis has moved whether computers in general encourage poor writing or whether the greater audience available through networks is a spur to creativity.

Author: Lewis, Peter H.
Publisher: The New York Times Company
Publication Name: The New York Times
Subject: News, opinion and commentary
ISSN: 0362-4331
Year: 1992
Column, Surveys, Education, Technological innovations, Literacy, Language arts, Word processing, Writing Skills, Accuracy, Reduction

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


In the home office, equipment may still be deductible; computers, faxes and answering machines may meet I.R.S. requirements

Article Abstract:

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has ruled that home office space can be declared a tax deduction only if it is the place where the taxpayer's most important business is done and where most of her working day is spent. An IRS official, however, says that home office equipment can be deductible if the taxpayer can document the extent to which an equipment is used for business. If, through meticulous log-keeping, the home office worker is able to establish that the equipment is used for business 100 percent or close to it, the chances for IRS approval is greater than one in which the equipment is shared by other members of the household. The best way to guarantee the deductibility of office equipment is to buy them exclusively for the business and put them in a specific area in the house that is also used exclusively for the business.

Author: Lewis, Peter H.
Publisher: The New York Times Company
Publication Name: The New York Times
Subject: News, opinion and commentary
ISSN: 0362-4331
Year: 1993
Finance, taxation, & monetary policy, Laws, regulations and rules, Work environment, Tax policy, Home offices, United States. Internal Revenue Service, Office Equipment, Government Agency, Government Regulation, Tax Deduction, Work at Home

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Making a model and doing it fast. Moving the Pampers faster cuts everyone's costs; consumer-goods makers and retailers find that 'just-in-time' works for them too
  • Abstracts: Founder of Kaypro sees life in the company yet. Digital's return starts with hope
  • Abstracts: 'Paperless office' evolves with paper, but less of it. Bedside computers watch the vital signs
  • Abstracts: Computer images are staking out star roles in movies. Sony's true-blue model of U.S. laser
  • Abstracts: Using the spin of electrons to make the smallest chips yet: each chip could hold trillions of transistors, compressing vast power into a tiny space
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.