Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

News, opinion and commentary

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » News, opinion and commentary

House panel approves bill to curb 'Baby Bell' services

Article Abstract:

A bill that would exclude the regional Bell holding companies from the information services and equipment manufacturing sectors of the telecommunications industry for the foreseeable future has been passed by a House Judiciary subcommittee by a vote of 10 to 6. The bill is unlikely to become law in its current form, however. The Bush administration has repeatedly threatened to veto the bill, and it is also a bone of contention over jurisdictional matters between Rep. Jack Brooks (D-TX), the bill's author and chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, and Rep. John D. Dingell (D-MI), chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. Dingell, who also favors continuing restrictions on the so-called Baby Bells, was unable to wrest jurisdiction over the bill away from Brooks' committee and has been unable to introduce any legislation of his own. The Bell companies and their allies have registered their protest of the bill, but such diverse interests as newspaper publishers, consumer groups, information services and equipment manufacturers have all praised it.

Author: Andrews, Edmund L.
Publisher: The New York Times Company
Publication Name: The New York Times
Subject: News, opinion and commentary
ISSN: 0362-4331
Year: 1992
United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Regulators moving to break local telephone monopolies

Article Abstract:

The New York State Public Service Commission put rules into place on Nov 25, 1991, allowing more competition in local telephone services. Under the new rules, telecommunications companies can contract to supply services to business customers and fulfill their contracts by running lines to central switches of the New York Telephone Company. Thus, companies that previously were locked out will now be able to access the public network. The commission will allow 90 days for New York Telephone to object. New York is the first locality in the nation to adopt such rules, but similar decisions are expected elsewhere. Industry observers and regulators believe that increased competition will being lower prices and improved services as well as backup arrangements that will improve network reliability.

Author: Andrews, Edmund L.
Publisher: The New York Times Company
Publication Name: The New York Times
Subject: News, opinion and commentary
ISSN: 0362-4331
Year: 1991
COMMUNICATION, Deregulation, Monopolies, Telecommunications, Competition, New York (State). Public Service Commission, New York. Public Service Commission

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: Laws, regulations and rules, Telecommunications services industry, Telecommunications industry, Telephone companies, Regional Bell Operating Companies, Telephone Company, Government Regulation, Bell Regional Holding Companies
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Debating the curbs on 'Baby Bells.' (government regulation the the Bell Regional Holding Companies) Bill to allot airwaves advanced; some frequencies would shift from U.S. to private use
  • Abstracts: Threat to cellular phone services. Competitor in cellular telephones; F.C.C. lets concern start up in 6 cities
  • Abstracts: U S West's net off 11%; Bell Atlantic posts gain. 2 'Baby Bells' diverge on earnings
  • Abstracts: 'Baby Bell' entering cable TV: New Jersey venture to use phone lines
  • Abstracts: Two European giants fail to stop their slides. Europe's electronics rescue plan. French computer maker sees $1 billion deficit
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.