Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

News, opinion and commentary

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » News, opinion and commentary

Two rivals form pool for HDTV: would share rights from U.S. patents

Article Abstract:

Two of four groups developing high definition television systems have agreed to split royalties if either of them wins government support. The two groups are comprised of the General Instrument Corporation and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and the Zenith Electronics Corporation and AT&T. The cooperative agreement allows both groups to hedge their bets, reduce financial risk and gain access to patent rights once a standard is chosen. HDTV provides a crisper picture and better sound quality than the television systems currently in use. The number of companies and groups competing has dropped from over 20 to just four. NHK is one remaining competitor, but it is developing an analog system that analysts believe will not impress the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). A consortium including NBC, North American Philips, Thomson SA and the David Sarnoff Research Center is developing an HDTV digital system.

Author: Andrews, Edmund L.
Publisher: The New York Times Company
Publication Name: The New York Times
Subject: News, opinion and commentary
ISSN: 0362-4331
Year: 1992
Electronic computers, Computer terminals, Telephone communications, exc. radio, Electronic components, not elsewhere classified, Electron tubes, Management, Product development, United States. Federal Communications Commission, Standard, Standardization, General Instrument Corp., Television equipment industry, American Telephone and Telegraph Co., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Digital television, High-definition television, High definition television, Zenith Electronics Corp., Cooperative Agreements

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Algorithm ruling may aid software

Article Abstract:

A federal court of appeals has overturned the US Patent Office's claim that an inventor cannot patent a device or program that contains a mathematical algorithm as its principle constituent. Previously, the Patent Office held that an algorithm is a mathematical abstraction viewed as a description of universal relationships that could be discovered, but not owned. Algorithms play a large part in the software, consumer electronics and telecommunications industry. They are the basis for telephone switching systems, compact disk players and facsimile machines. The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit determined that Sharp Corp may receive a patent for a voice recognition circuit that uses an algorithm to measure the similarity between incoming sounds and words stored in the device's memory.

Author: Andrews, Edmund L.
Publisher: The New York Times Company
Publication Name: The New York Times
Subject: News, opinion and commentary
ISSN: 0362-4331
Year: 1989
Laws, regulations and rules, Consumer electronics industry, Consumer electronics, Algorithms, Patent law, Algorithm, United States. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Sharp Corp. (Osaka, Japan), column, Legal Issues, Lawsuits

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Inquiry starts on chip patent dispute

Article Abstract:

The Patent and Trademark Office will re-examine a disputed claim involving a patent issued in Jul 1990, to Gilbert P. Hyatt. According to Hyatt, his patent applies to a broad range of processors that are now used in everything from calculators to microcomputers. Such a patent could force companies to pay Hyatt millions of dollars in royalties. Texas Instruments (TI), for example, could be a big loser. TI contends that one of its own researchers, Gary W. Boone, was the first to invent the single-chip microcomputer. The Patent Office has informed TI that the agency will weigh Hyatt's claims against those of Boone. Hyatt's patent covers a chip design that includes a fixed memory for holding instructions, an alterable memory for holding data and a microprocessor for carrying out computations.

Author: Andrews, Edmund L.
Publisher: The New York Times Company
Publication Name: The New York Times
Subject: News, opinion and commentary
ISSN: 0362-4331
Year: 1991
Semiconductors and related devices, Semiconductor industry, Integrated circuits, Intellectual property, Texas Instruments Inc., TXN, Hyatt, Gilbert

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Patent, Cases, United States. Patent and Trademark Office
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Time to make room for Daddy. No way to make friends. Why Kerry is right on Iraq
  • Abstracts: The Trudeau storm. Blaming Trudeau for our troubles. Why Trudeau feels the thread slipping, the link with the mood of his listeners gone
  • Abstracts: Computer groups agree on plan for Japan trade. U.S.-Japan telecommunications accord. Europe vows no bias against U.S. chips
  • Abstracts: A hard road for software merger: enemies are united at Dun & Bradstreet. Software is the next target
  • Abstracts: The California phone rush is on. U.S. accuses 2 Nynex companies of overcharging and fines them. Regulatory victory for A.T.&T.; F.C.C. ruling allows its custom networks for big businesses
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.