Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Petroleum, energy and mining industries

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Petroleum, energy and mining industries

Optimal pollution taxes and endogenous technological progress

Article Abstract:

A study was conducted to determine the optimal pollution tax in a regime of endogenous innovation under a patent system. The results show that the optimal pollution tax will exceed marginal environmental damages only in a monopoly and when patents are too weak to protect against copying. Otherwise, monopoly pricing by the patent holder, excess of patent holder revenue over social benefits from innovation due to convex environmental damages and the common pool effect of research render the optimal tax lower than the marginal environmental damages.

Author: Parry, Ian W.H.
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Resource and Energy Economics
Subject: Petroleum, energy and mining industries
ISSN: 0928-7655
Year: 1995
Industrial research, Environmental economics, Pollution control equipment

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


How large a carbon tax is justified by the secondary benefits of CO2 abatement?

Article Abstract:

The term secondary benefits of abatement refers to the level of pollutants reduced as a result of a comprehensive pollution abatement plan. An analysis of current estimates of the levels of CO2 abatement reveals that the secondary benefits of such an abatement is about the same as the gross abatement costs of significant levels of abatement. It suggests that a 25-50% reduction in CO2 emissions, resulting from a $100/tC carbon tax as mandated under the Second Sulphur Protocol, can be achieved at negative net cost.

Author: Ekins, Paul
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Resource and Energy Economics
Subject: Petroleum, energy and mining industries
ISSN: 0928-7655
Year: 1996
Carbon dioxide, Air pollution, Energy economics

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


"More is less": The tax effects of ignoring flow externalities

Article Abstract:

A corrective tax can reduce pollution.

Author: Sandal, Leif K., Steinshamn, Stein Ivar, Grafton, R. Quinton
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication Name: Resource and Energy Economics
Subject: Petroleum, energy and mining industries
ISSN: 0928-7655
Year: 2003
Science & research, Taxes, Tax policy

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Research, Taxation, Environmental aspects, Pollution
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Accumulative pollution, "clean technology," and policy design. Financial structure and the effectiveness of pollution control in an oligopolistic industry
  • Abstracts: Optimizing production technology choices: conventional production vs. recycling. The choice of environmental policy instruments under correlated uncertainty
  • Abstracts: Optimal Prediction of Times and Queue Lengths in the GI-M-1 Queue
  • Abstracts: Optimal Prediction of Times and Queue Lengths in the GI-M-1 Queue. part 2 Minimizing Delays in the GI-G-1 Queue
  • Abstracts: Compensation and benefits: more than money. Technology transfer there and back
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.