Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Philosophy and religion

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Philosophy and religion

Contractualism and aggregation

Article Abstract:

The general contractualist account of wrongness lends support to the moral significance of numbers, particularly the 'cases of equal harms' and the 'cases of small inequalities in harm.' However, this moral principle of saving the greater number of people may create problems if interpreted under the model of reasonable rejectability based on T.M. Scanlon's concept of contractualism. In this model, a principle can be rejected if reasonable grounds exist. Moreover, the point of view of each individual is considered.

Author: Reibetanz, Sophia
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0014-1704
Year: 1998
Ethics, Right and wrong, Scanlon, Thomas

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


The moral legislature: contractualism without an Archimedean point

Article Abstract:

A moral contract theory based on actual consent can be conceived as a moral legislature in which practices are approved by unanimous vote of rational agents deliberating under real time constraints. The legislature is Kantian in procedure, but the arguments tend to be utilitarian. This model can be used to show why 'do not kill' is a moral rule, but 'obey the law' is not. Although the moral legislature is slow to change and may not generate many moral rules, it does offer insights into moral practice.

Author: Davis, Michael
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0014-1704
Year: 1992
Political ethics, Social contract, Legislative bodies

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Compatibilism and contractualism: The possibility of moral responsibility

Article Abstract:

A distinctively contractualist principle for compatibilism is proposed to defend moral responsibility where its possibility is not dependent on the falsehood of determinism. It is observed that the truth of determinism is not an obstacle to the fairness of holding people responsible.

Author: Lenman, James
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0014-1704
Year: 2006
Free will and determinism, Determinism, Determinism (Philosophy), Contractarianism, Moral responsibility

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Analysis, Beliefs, opinions and attitudes, Ethical aspects
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Conceptions of choice and conceptions of autonomy. Social freedom and the test of moral responsibility. Rewarding regret
  • Abstracts: Dispositional ethical realism. Cultural context and moral responsibility. Strawson's way of naturalizing responsibility
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.