Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Philosophy and religion

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Philosophy and religion

Moral rules

Article Abstract:

Moral rules represent the association between moral properties and their grounds. These rules determine morally relevant features, fix a moral verdict and delimit the set of morally relevant features in the ethical analysis of a situation. However, the absolutist and the prima facie theories offer different interpretations of the nature of moral rules. The absolutist theory suggests that moral rules can infer moral conclusions from a situation once the relevant rules are determined. The prima facie theory proposes that conclusions can be assumed when the rules and grounding properties are considered.

Author: Shafer-Landau, Russ
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0014-1704
Year: 1997

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


In defense of The Moral Problem: a reply to Brink, Copp, and Sayre-McCord

Article Abstract:

Authors David Brink, David Copp and Geoffrey Sayre-McCord have presented their criticism of the book, 'The Moral Problem,' which proposed a solution to the problems posed by three doctrines on morality. Brink restated the problem in another manner while Copp and Sayre-McCord were both analytical of the analysis presented by the book's author. In defense of 'The Moral Problem,' the author reiterates the main arguments of the book and then proceeds to comment on the different criticisms made by Brink, Copp and Sayre-McCord.

Author: Smith, Michael
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0014-1704
Year: 1997
Criticism and interpretation, The Moral Problem (Book), Brink, David, Copp, David, Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Moral responsibility and ignorance

Article Abstract:

Ignorance of facts is the failure of a person to know the truth. Any truth arising out of ignorance presupposes moral responsibility on the part of the actor. However, moral responsibility, although closely interlinked with the concept of ignorance, should be taken on a case to case basis. Culpability involves the belief on the agent's part that something wrong is being done. In the absence of such awareness, one is not morally responsible.

Author: Zimmerman, Michael J.
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication Name: Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0014-1704
Year: 1997
Responsibility, Ignorance (Theory of knowledge)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Analysis, Ethics
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: Moral generalism: Enjoy in moderation. Moral address, moral responsibility, and the boundaries of the moral community
  • Abstracts: Liberal toleration in Rawl's Law of Peoples. The autonomy defense of free speech. Can liberals support a ban on violent pornography?
  • Abstracts: The ethical environment facing purchasing and supply management professionals: a multinational perspective. Markets in health care: individualistic values versus communitarian claims
  • Abstracts: Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness. Toward an ethics of organizations. Upping the stakes: a response to John Hasnas on the normative viabillity of the stockholder and stakeholder theories
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.