Abstracts - faqs.org

Abstracts

Philosophy and religion

Search abstracts:
Abstracts » Philosophy and religion

Paid organ donation - the Grey Basket concept

Article Abstract:

Many ethical issues emerged concerning paid organ donations for transplantation worldwide. The perceived shortage of organs and the increasing number of patients requiring organ transplantations were believed to be contributing to unethical practices and the subsequent criminal behavior regarding the medical procedure. It was suggested that the Grey Basket concept should be considered in organ donation and transplantation wherein the medical professionals decide on the ethical issues involved in the procedure based on their own principles and conscientious values.

Author: Daar, A.S.
Publisher: British Medical Association
Publication Name: Journal of Medical Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0306-6800
Year: 1998
Editorial, Organ transplant recipients, Medical personnel, Donation of organs, tissues, etc., Tissue donation

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Doing harm: living organ donors, clinical research and 'The Tenth Man'

Article Abstract:

Organ donation from living persons and volunteering for potentially fatal research is ethically questionable even if the donor consents to do so. The organ donors should decide whether to harm themselves for the sake of others or not while the doctors and researchers, instead of considering self-interest, should see the interest of the donor against the recipient. In this regard, the moral aspects of self sacrifice in Graham Greene's novel, 'The Tenth Man' are discussed.

Author: Elliott, Carl
Publisher: British Medical Association
Publication Name: Journal of Medical Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0306-6800
Year: 1995

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Xenotransplantation

Article Abstract:

The scientific assertion that xenotransplantation is justifiable because the benefits derived by humans from the process far outweigh the damages or suffering it inflicts on animals is not ethically correct. Humans, being of a higher moral status, do not have a right to cause pain on lesser creatures for their own benefit. Xenotransplantation connotes nothing less than the commodification of living, breathing creatures.

Author: Downie, Robin
Publisher: British Medical Association
Publication Name: Journal of Medical Ethics
Subject: Philosophy and religion
ISSN: 0306-6800
Year: 1997
Animal welfare, Human-animal relationships

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


Subjects list: Ethical aspects, Transplantation of organs, tissues, etc., Organ transplantation, Tissue transplantation, Transplantation, Organ donors, Tissue donors
Similar abstracts:
  • Abstracts: The ethics of HIV research in developing nations. Replies to commentaries. Ethics of placebo-controlled trials in developing countries
  • Abstracts: Character and integrity in organizations: the civilization of the workplace. Genetically modified foods: the creation of trust and access to global markets
  • Abstracts: Moralism and cruelty: reflections on Hume and Kant. Morality as Consistency in Living: Korsgaard's Kantian Lectures(*)
  • Abstracts: In search of a Christian work ethic for the corporate worker. Integration in Christian ethical decision-making
  • Abstracts: Remediation and an ethical imperative: the role of public agency in environmental practice. Are we ready for God? Value and profit in sustainable development and market capitalism
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.
Some parts © 2025 Advameg, Inc.